They said that people who weren't Christians could be slaves.
Chat with our AI personalities
Landowners justified owning slaves by claiming that it was necessary for the economy and their way of life. They argued that slaves were inferior and in need of their guidance, and that it was their duty to provide for and protect them. They also used religious and philosophical arguments to support the idea that slavery was justified and natural.
Landowners during the time of slavery often justified owning slaves by citing economic benefits, social norms, and religious beliefs. They argued that slavery was necessary for maintaining their economic prosperity by providing cheap labor. Additionally, they believed that it was a social norm that had been practiced for generations and accepted by society. Some landowners also used religious justifications, citing passages from the Bible that seemed to support slavery.
The policy you are referring to is known as the encomienda system, where Spanish conquistadors were granted the right by the king to extract labor and tribute from indigenous peoples in the Americas.
Some basic rights that slaves did not have included the right to own property, the right to marry without permission, the right to education, and the right to freedom of movement.
Slavery denied slaves their basic human rights by stripping them of their freedom and autonomy, treating them as property rather than individuals with inherent dignity and rights. Slaves were subjected to harsh working conditions, physical abuse, and forced separation from their families, depriving them of fundamental human rights such as the right to liberty, safety, and equality.
Slaves did not have the right to own property, marry freely, have legal protection, or receive education. They were also denied basic human rights such as freedom of movement, freedom of speech, and the right to a fair trial.