answersLogoWhite

0

They said that people who weren't Christians could be slaves.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

How did landowners explain that owing slaves was all right?

Landowners during the time of slavery often justified owning slaves by citing economic benefits, social norms, and religious beliefs. They argued that slavery was necessary for maintaining their economic prosperity by providing cheap labor. Additionally, they believed that it was a social norm that had been practiced for generations and accepted by society. Some landowners also used religious justifications, citing passages from the Bible that seemed to support slavery.


A policy whereby a certain number of Indian slaves were granted to landowners by the king is called What?

encomiendaA policy whereby a certain number of Indian slaves were granted to landowners by the king.


What were some basic rights slaves did not have?

slaves couldn't get married buy houses or get jobs


How did slavery deny slaves their basic human rights?

Slavery denied slaves their basic human rights by stripping them of their freedom and autonomy, treating them as property rather than individuals with inherent dignity and rights. Slaves were subjected to harsh working conditions, physical abuse, and forced separation from their families, depriving them of fundamental human rights such as the right to liberty, safety, and equality.


What were some rights slaves didn't have?

Slaves did not have the right to own property, marry freely, have legal protection, or receive education. They were also denied basic human rights such as freedom of movement, freedom of speech, and the right to a fair trial.

Related Questions

How did landowners justify the idea of owning slaves?

They believed they had the right to enslave non-Christians.


How did Georgia's government respond when wealthy landowners demanded the right to own slaves?

They allowed landowners to own slaves.


How did landowners explain that owing slaves was all right?

Landowners during the time of slavery often justified owning slaves by citing economic benefits, social norms, and religious beliefs. They argued that slavery was necessary for maintaining their economic prosperity by providing cheap labor. Additionally, they believed that it was a social norm that had been practiced for generations and accepted by society. Some landowners also used religious justifications, citing passages from the Bible that seemed to support slavery.


Why was owning land important to colonists?

Colonial landowners were free to use or sell all that their land produced. Also, owning land gave men the right to vote. Because of landownership was the means to wealth and political powerm it also helped determine social standing.


Why would Southerner's believe that owning slaves was progressive?

Because it was the mainstay of the cotton industry, which the South saw as everything fit and right.


A policy whereby a certain number of Indian slaves were granted to landowners by the king is called What?

encomiendaA policy whereby a certain number of Indian slaves were granted to landowners by the king.


In the years following the ratification of the constitution what would have been most likely to possess the right to vote?

explain "these"


Did slaves have the right to equal treatment?

No slaves did not have right to equal treatment!


What right granted by Queen Isabella gave Spanish settlers the right of landowners to use native Americans as laborers?

Encomienda.


In early Massachusetts bay the right to vote was limited to who?

White, male, landowners.


What gave slave owners the right to capture runaway slaves?

The Fugitive Slave Act. When Congress agreed to enforce this more rigorously, it set up a wave of sympathy for the runaways, and put the North in the mood for war on the slave-owning South.


Is owning a gun a right or responsibility?

Depends on where it's viewed where you are. In the US, it's a right which carries responsibilities with it. Even in places where firearms ownership is permitted but not viewed as an inherent right, there's still responsibilities carried with owning a firearm.