answersLogoWhite

0

When ter s violation of fundamental rights v can directly go to supreme court.. Whereas in second case v can't appeal to supreme court directly.. moreover, the ordinary rights are granted by the ordinary laws. they do not have the same sanctions and sanctity as the fundamental rights have because the latter is guaranteed by the constitution itself. the fundamental rights are incorporated in the constitution.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

What are and what is the difference between statutory and non statutory rights?

The difference between statutory and non statutory rights is that one is supplied by the government and the other one isn't. Statutory rights are bestowed by particular government to governed people and are relative to specific cultures and governments


What is the difference between a legal right and natural right?

A legal right is a right that is granted and protected by law, often enforced by the government. A natural right, on the other hand, is seen as a fundamental right that all individuals possess inherently, regardless of any laws. Natural rights are considered to be universal and inalienable.


Which landmark case set a precedent or standard for identifying a class of fundamental personal rights?

The landmark case that set a precedent for identifying a class of fundamental personal rights is Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). This case established the right to privacy as a fundamental right, extending protections to activities such as marital privacy and contraception. The ruling in Griswold laid the foundation for future cases involving personal autonomy and privacy rights.


Ask us is the difference between total and selective incorporation?

Total incorporation is the legal doctrine which holds that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause incorporates all of the protections in the Bill of Rights against the states. Selective incorporation, on the other hand, is the legal doctrine which holds that the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause incorporates only certain fundamental protections in the Bill of Rights against the states.


Difference between just and unjust laws?

Just laws are fair and promote justice and equality, while unjust laws are discriminatory and create inequalities. Just laws are based on ethical principles and protect the rights of all individuals, whereas unjust laws violate fundamental rights and harm certain groups or individuals. Ultimately, just laws contribute to a just society where everyone is treated with dignity and fairness.

Related Questions

What is the difference between fundamental rights and directive principles?

fundamental right are concerned with the citizens while directive principle is concerned with the state..


What is the difference between Fundamental rights and Constitutional rights?

Fundamental right is for every citizen while constitutional right is given by the constitution to indivual e.g. public servant etc.


Difference between directive principles of state policy and the fundamental rights?

Fundamental rights are justiciable where as directive principles are not justiciable. The provision of directive priciple thus cannot be enforced in court of law.


Difference between fundamental rights and fundamental duty?

difference between duty and right difference between duty and right my answer is: duty is an obligation while right is freedom to exercise a duty like voting. there is a "moral" duty to vote but the right to ignore that duty [ obligation ] to your peril i might add


Whats the difference between Virginia Declaration of Rights and Declaration of Rights?

There is a difference


Are human rights and fundamental rights equal?

What are the distinctions between Human Rights and Fundamental Rights?Fundamental rights are similar to human rights but are different in the sense that they have legal obligations and are enforceable in a court of law but human rights do not have such legal obligations and are not enforceable in courts. The other distinctions between HR and FR are as below:v Human rights are relatively new concept while fundamental rights are protected by constitutions of various countries is older.v While there is no consensus on universal human rights, fundamental rights are specific and have legal sanction.v Human rights are more basic in nature than fundamental rights.v Human rights are applicable to all human beings on the earth whereas fundamental rights are country specified.


When was fundamental rights established?

Fundamental rights in the United States were established with the Bill of Rights.


Are fundamental rights absolute in nature?

yes fundamental rights are justiciable.


What is the difference between fundamental fairness doctrine and incorporation doctorine?

Fundamental Fairness Doctrine- General Fairness and states define their own provisions Incorporation- The Bill of Rights is incorporated and states have to follow procedures exactly as defined by the US Supreme Court


When was Fundamental Rights Agency created?

Fundamental Rights Agency was created in 2007.


Does the constitution of Pakistan gives fundamental rights to all citizens?

No, there are differences between men and women


What is the difference between rights issue and public issue?

There is a small difference between rights and public issues is simple. Rights involve the individual or small group and public generally involves the whole.