When ter s violation of fundamental rights v can directly go to supreme court.. Whereas in second case v can't appeal to supreme court directly.. moreover, the ordinary rights are granted by the ordinary laws. they do not have the same sanctions and sanctity as the fundamental rights have because the latter is guaranteed by the constitution itself. the fundamental rights are incorporated in the constitution.
The difference between statutory and non statutory rights is that one is supplied by the government and the other one isn't. Statutory rights are bestowed by particular government to governed people and are relative to specific cultures and governments
Rights are what you are entitled to, depending on where you are, and obligation is what you are obliged to do, ei. what you have to do regarding those rights, for example, children have a right to be loved, but their obligation is to be respective of others.
Lawrence v. Texas was the landmark case that set a precedent or standard for identifying a class of fundamental personal rights.
collective rights are for certain specific groups of people, like the Indian Act. Individual rights are meant to protect an Individual and his interests. For example: Right to life.
I'm no lawyer, but the constitution gives you rights and freedom do to what ever you want, while legal sources usually have contracts.
fundamental right are concerned with the citizens while directive principle is concerned with the state..
Fundamental right is for every citizen while constitutional right is given by the constitution to indivual e.g. public servant etc.
Fundamental rights are justiciable where as directive principles are not justiciable. The provision of directive priciple thus cannot be enforced in court of law.
difference between duty and right difference between duty and right my answer is: duty is an obligation while right is freedom to exercise a duty like voting. there is a "moral" duty to vote but the right to ignore that duty [ obligation ] to your peril i might add
What are the distinctions between Human Rights and Fundamental Rights?Fundamental rights are similar to human rights but are different in the sense that they have legal obligations and are enforceable in a court of law but human rights do not have such legal obligations and are not enforceable in courts. The other distinctions between HR and FR are as below:v Human rights are relatively new concept while fundamental rights are protected by constitutions of various countries is older.v While there is no consensus on universal human rights, fundamental rights are specific and have legal sanction.v Human rights are more basic in nature than fundamental rights.v Human rights are applicable to all human beings on the earth whereas fundamental rights are country specified.
Fundamental rights in the United States were established with the Bill of Rights.
There is a difference
yes fundamental rights are justiciable.
Fundamental Fairness Doctrine- General Fairness and states define their own provisions Incorporation- The Bill of Rights is incorporated and states have to follow procedures exactly as defined by the US Supreme Court
Fundamental Rights Agency was created in 2007.
what is the differences between rights and responsibilities
No, there are differences between men and women