Nothing they are the same.
is it right to constitutional remedies??
fundamental right are concerned with the citizens while directive principle is concerned with the state..
The fundamental issue that was raised at the constitutional convention was slave trade and human rights abuses. Those were the issues that were strife then.
Fundamental rights are justiciable where as directive principles are not justiciable. The provision of directive priciple thus cannot be enforced in court of law.
difference between duty and right difference between duty and right my answer is: duty is an obligation while right is freedom to exercise a duty like voting. there is a "moral" duty to vote but the right to ignore that duty [ obligation ] to your peril i might add
forty-second amendment
natural rights you're welcome.
There exist many differences. The most important being that the fundamental rights can be enforced by a court of law (against the state), while Directive Principles are not. Fundamental rights are inalienabe rights, whereas Directive Principles are aimed at securing welfare, which are more like constitutional guidelines.
Substantive due process is a constitutional doctrine that protects certain fundamental rights not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. It recognizes that certain rights, such as privacy or autonomy, are deeply rooted in our nation's history and traditions. These fundamental rights are protected from government interference and cannot be infringed upon without a compelling state interest and a narrowly tailored means to achieve that interest.
44
When ter s violation of fundamental rights v can directly go to supreme court.. Whereas in second case v can't appeal to supreme court directly.. moreover, the ordinary rights are granted by the ordinary laws. they do not have the same sanctions and sanctity as the fundamental rights have because the latter is guaranteed by the constitution itself. the fundamental rights are incorporated in the constitution.