yes and no depending on how much nuclear bombs it can start a ice age like the asteroid that hit earth so its not enough to destroy the earth
Yes if there are enough nuclear weapons flying all over the World. The answer is yes, they can destroy the whole entire earth.
The most destructive weapon on earth is the hydrogen bomb. These weapons are potentially thousands of times more powerful than ordinary atom bombs (which use nuclear fission rather than fusion) and could easily destroy a city in seconds.
As a natural element curium exist in infinitesimal amounts in uranium ores.Artificial curium is from nuclear wastes, nuclear reactors burned fuels, nuclear weapons tests.
There are many theories predicting the destruction of earth by global warming, backed by historians claiming that the Mayan and aztect almanac is ending. But the scientists at most advanced geology department of Switzerland claim that World Ending by Global Warming is an American Fund Raising Governemntal Hoax. The destruction of earth could materialize if there is a war now, because all the power blocks are equipped with more nuclear weapons than they claim.
Global warming will not destroy the earth. The earth can deal with temperatures very much hotter than now. However, if global warming does not stop it will destroy all life on earth.
to destroy the wicked men that were on the earth
Yes they are very effective. Nuclear weapons are dangerous and really effective to destroy all life on earth. They are very powerful.
Four Times Over
Nuclear Weapons are highly destructive weapons that can wipe entire citites of the face of the earth. The use of such a weapon is both inhuman and pointless, as the entire reason you go to war is to secure territory and what use is it if the entire area has become a radioactive and extremely hazardous Wasteland? Nuclear Weapons are highly destructive weapons that can wipe entire cities of the face of the earth. The use of such a weapon is both inhuman and pointless, as the entire reason you go to war is to secure territory and what use is it if the entire area has become a radioactive and extremely hazardous Wasteland?
Once, because the first time The USA, UK, Canada and France will attack instantly after the first!
A large enough body from space (comet, asteroid, meteor) that did not break up when coming through the Earth's atmosphere; a large sun flare or coronal blast; and a nuclear weapon detonation all have the ability to destroy entire cities and impair electronic communication systems.
No. Nukes are nuclear weapons but they suppose to use nukes to protect the earth not to destroy the earth. Eventually, nukes are not the best idea to use against other countries. We all know that nukes can win war but you should not use them.
Your questions asks for an opinion. My opinion is no. The knowledge of how to build a nuclear weapon is out there. There are too many people with different views and values for nuclear weapons to just go away.
In the short term, say, the next 100 years, we should worry much more about nuclear weapons. It is possible, but not very likely, that an asteroid will destroy mankind, or even cause serious damage, in the next 100 years.
not worth thinking about , a nuclear war would in itself be a chain reaction causing humanitys elimination . the earth cannot be destroyed but we can .
It may take a thousand of tons on TNT to pack a nuclear bomb. But to destroy the earth, it may take billions to trillions tons of TNT plus a nuclear igniter to blow the earth to bits of dust.
One Modern weapon that the USA has is the nuclear bomb. Also known as the atom bomb. The USA also has a large missile that can go any place on Earth and can cause major damage.
The most destructive weapon on earth is the hydrogen bomb. These weapons are potentially thousands of times more powerful than ordinary atom bombs (which use nuclear fission rather than fusion) and could easily destroy a city in seconds.