0
What else can I help you with?
What is the reason that a theory might be replaced with a new theory?
a theory is an explanation to a specific question being studied. it has been tested many times. it might be replaced with a new theory because new information come and so the past information will be improved.
Is the big bang theory a load of crap?
It is the current working theory of the origin of the universe. It is the paradigm that Astronomy is based upon. But, new evidence is always being described. The theory itself might change as our knowledge grows.
What evidence does not support the big bang theory?
At present there is no observational evidence that would cause someone to question the idea that, about 13.7 billion years ago, the space containing our entire Universe began to expand and has been expanding ever since. Until about 1998, astronomers thought they had detected white dwarf stars that were older than that, but that dating has since been revised.Big Bang Cosmology, with inflation, makes certain predictions about what we would see if it were true -- and we see all of those except the overwhelming predominance of matter. We do not see any of the predictions made by alternatives to BBC.Answer2:The redshift data does not support the Big Bang Theory and without the redshift interpretion favored by the Big bang, there is no Big Bang.Edwin Hubble did not believe that the redshift indicated expansion. Hubble saw the redshift as an hitherto unrecognized principle of nature.The redshift is the effect of centripetal force mv2/r = mv2/ct = v/c(mv/t) = v/c(p/t)= (v/c)mThe unrecognized principle of nature is the refraction effect of gravity on light.n=c/v or v= c/n.The Universe is older than 13.7 Billion years, likely around 16.5 billion yearsThe proper law of Gravity is W = -mGM/r + cmV = -mu/r + cP where cP is the so-called "Dark Energy", or the actual vector Momentum Energy cmV= cP. This is The Quaternion Universe with scalar and vector energy!
Why do you think people didnt believ his continental drift theory when wagener first explained it?
People initially did not believe Alfred Wegener's continental drift theory because he lacked a mechanism to explain how continents could move across the Earth's surface. Additionally, there was insufficient evidence at the time to support his theory. It was not until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
What scientist believe provides evidence of the big bang theory?
Scientists do not sit in the coffeeshop and dream up a theory and thengo looking for evidence to support it. Scientists make observations andmeasurements of what IS ... the "evidence" you might say ... and then tryto put together a theory to explain what they see.The "Big Bang" theory is the best explanation so far for the observation that allgalaxies in every direction are receding from us at speeds that are proportionalto their distance from us, and for the observation that all of space is filled withan almost uniform level of electromagnetic radiation with a distribution of wavelengthsthat is characteristic of a blackbody at the temperature of 2.7 K, and for theobservation that on the largest scale, the universe consists of roughly 75%hydrogen and 24% helium.
Is a theory a prediction?
No, a theory is not a prediction. A theory is a well-supported explanation for a phenomenon based on evidence and research, while a prediction is a statement about what might happen in the future based on the theory.
What might cause scientists to change scientific theory?
Because technology might change in the future.
Can a theory be true or false?
Yes. If you have a theory about how things work, it might turn out to be true or it might turn out to be false. The more you know about the subject, the stronger the theory is likely to be, and the likelier it is that the theory will be proven.
When might a historians point of view become bias?
When the historian has no evidence to back up his theory
Do the police have any comment on the theory that the Ripper might have been a cop?
That theory does not appear in the records. Remember that many evidence and records have been lost.
What might cause scienctists to reject a popular theory?
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
What does theories predictions and evidence mean in Science?
theory- Studying something then making a prediction. Then you study a little bit more and thinking your THEORY was right. so theory and prediction are almost the same thing. Prediction- The difference between theory and prediction is that a prediction is a guess it isn't exactly right but you think it might happen. Evidence- Is what you need to make sure your THEORY is correct.
What is the reason that a theory might be replaced with a new theory?
a theory is an explanation to a specific question being studied. it has been tested many times. it might be replaced with a new theory because new information come and so the past information will be improved.
Is the big bang theory a load of crap?
It is the current working theory of the origin of the universe. It is the paradigm that Astronomy is based upon. But, new evidence is always being described. The theory itself might change as our knowledge grows.
Why might a scientists theory might not be believed even if it correct?
A scientist's theory might not be believed even it is correct, if the theory is such a radical departure from existing beliefs that it seems bizarre. The theory of continental drift (which, of course, was eventually accepted) was resisted for decades because it just seemed obvious to people that the continents are not drifting, since we do not notice any such motion. It could also happen that a scientist has a valid theory but has not adequately explained, or experimentally tested that theory. Other scientists require evidence in order to accept a theory.
What is another word for to give evidence?
proof, grounds, demonstration, confirmation, verification, corroboration, authentication, substantiation
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
