0
At present there is no observational evidence that would cause someone to question the idea that, about 13.7 billion years ago, the space containing our entire Universe began to expand and has been expanding ever since. Until about 1998, astronomers thought they had detected white dwarf stars that were older than that, but that dating has since been revised.
Big Bang Cosmology, with inflation, makes certain predictions about what we would see if it were true -- and we see all of those except the overwhelming predominance of matter. We do not see any of the predictions made by alternatives to BBC.
Answer2:
The redshift data does not support the Big Bang Theory and without the redshift interpretion favored by the Big bang, there is no Big Bang.
Edwin Hubble did not believe that the redshift indicated expansion. Hubble saw the redshift as an hitherto unrecognized principle of nature.
The redshift is the effect of centripetal force mv2/r = mv2/ct = v/c(mv/t) = v/c(p/t)= (v/c)m
The unrecognized principle of nature is the refraction effect of gravity on light.
n=c/v or v= c/n.
The Universe is older than 13.7 Billion years, likely around 16.5 billion years
The proper law of Gravity is W = -mGM/r + cmV = -mu/r + cP where cP is the so-called "Dark Energy", or the actual vector Momentum Energy cmV= cP. This is The Quaternion Universe with scalar and vector energy!
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
One piece of evidence that challenges the Big Bang theory is the "horizon problem," which refers to the fact that the universe appears to be fairly homogeneous and isotropic on large scales despite regions of space being beyond each other's range of causal contact. This suggests that there might have been a period of rapid expansion that smoothed out the universe, but the exact mechanism remains unclear. Another challenge is the "flatness problem," which questions why the universe is so close to having a flat geometry if it has been expanding for billions of years.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How does the evidence of the wmap and COBE support the big bang theory?
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
Does the big bang theory support the big rip theory?
No
How does expanding universe provide evidence for big bang theory?
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
Is the number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy evidence in support of Big Bang Cosmology?
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
Who gave evidence of the big bang theory?
edwin hubble
How does the evidence of the wmap and COBE support the big bang theory?
The work provided even more additional evidence to support the Big Bang theory of the universe.It was also regarded as the starting point for cosmologyas a precision science.
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
Does the big bang theory support the big rip theory?
No
What evidence was used to develop the big bang theory?
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
How does expanding universe provide evidence for big bang theory?
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
What are the theory's about the universe?
Well I do now one theory about the universe. It's the big bang theory. The big bang theory is a theory about how the universe was created.Scientist think that a big explosion created the universe.Scientist found lots of evidence that the big bang theory was true.
What does the big bang theory have to do with the universes expansion?
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
Is the number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy evidence in support of Big Bang Cosmology?
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
Who gave evidence of the big bang theory?
edwin hubble
What evidence is collected in support of the big bang theory?
expansion of the universe as shown by the Hubble constant3K universal microwave background radiationetc.
What else supports the big bang theory besides the red shift?
Other evidence supporting the Big Bang theory includes the cosmic microwave background radiation, the abundance of light elements in the universe, and the large-scale structure and distribution of galaxies in the universe. Additionally, observations of the universe's expansion and the Hubble law provide further support for the Big Bang theory.
How did Fred hoyle regard the big bang theory?
Fred Hoyle was a proponent of the steady-state theory of the universe and was critical of the Big Bang theory. He famously likened the Big Bang theory to a "Big Bang" creation event and continued to advocate for his steady-state theory even after evidence supporting the Big Bang theory emerged.
