Q: Why is roman numeral for 49 not IL?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

The Roman numeral of IL = -1+50 => 49

The Roman numeral for 49 is 'XLIX'.

Nowadays 49 as a Roman numeral is notated as XLIX but the ancient Romans would have probably notated 49 as XXXXVIIII and abridged it to IL

I is 1 and L is 50. Because the I is before the L you subtract making 49. The proper way of representing 49 in Roman numerals is XLIX.

49 = XLIX

Related questions

The Roman numeral of IL = -1+50 => 49

The Roman numeral for 49 is 'XLIX'.

Nowadays 49 as a Roman numeral is notated as XLIX but the ancient Romans would have probably notated 49 as XXXXVIIII and abridged it to IL

I is 1 and L is 50. Because the I is before the L you subtract making 49. The proper way of representing 49 in Roman numerals is XLIX.

The Roman numeral for 49 is 'XLIX'.

49 = XLIX

The L represents 50 in Roman Numerals. This would be one way of saying 49, but most would say it as XLIX.

Because the modern rules now governing the Roman numeral system stipulates that 49 in Roman numerals is XLIX but the ancient Romans would have worked it out on an abacus counting device as XXXXVIIII and then probably abridged it to IL (50-1)

They represent 49 but the ancient Romans probably wrote out the equivalent of 49 simply as IL (50-1)

The number 49 is represented by the Roman numeral XLIX

ILAdditional Information:-50-1 = 49 and in today's notation in Roman numerals they are: XCIXBut the Romans themselves would have worked out 49 on an abacus counting device as XXXXVIIII and then simplified it to IL (-1+50=49)

In today's notation of Roman numerals it is: XLIX. But the Romans themselves would have calculated 49 on an abacus counting board as XXXXVIIII and probably simplified it to IL by placing I to both sides of tne numerals.