I is 1 and L is 50. Because the I is before the L you subtract making 49. The proper way of representing 49 in Roman numerals is XLIX.
The Roman numeral of IL = -1+50 => 49
Because according to today's rules governing the Roman numeral system 49 is XLIX But the Romans themselves would have probably wrote it out as IL (-1+50=49)
the answer to what is the roman numeral for 101 is CI
XXV is the Roman Numeral for 25
The L represents 50 in Roman Numerals. This would be one way of saying 49, but most would say it as XLIX.
The Roman numeral of IL = -1+50 => 49
Because according to today's rules governing the Roman numeral system 49 is XLIX But the Romans themselves would have probably wrote it out as IL (-1+50=49)
the answer to what is the roman numeral for 101 is CI
XXV is the Roman Numeral for 25
The L represents 50 in Roman Numerals. This would be one way of saying 49, but most would say it as XLIX.
324 written in roman numeral is CCCXXIV
Vivid is not a Roman numeral
No, K is not a roman numeral.
The roman numeral for one is I.
There is not a Roman Numeral for 0.
Nowadays 49 as a Roman numeral is notated as XLIX but the ancient Romans would have probably notated 49 as XXXXVIIII and abridged it to IL
V is a roman numeral representing the number 5.