Sikhism explicitly outlaws any caste-based stratification of society. Caste- or nobility-based surnames are therefore not allowed for Sikhs. And therefore, you cannot claim to be both a Sikh and a Jatt. This-as well as the obvious reason that there is no such thing as a uniquely "Sikh" surname other than Singh (for males) and Kaur (for females)-renders the question of "Raj" moot.
yes cheema is a sikh jatt surname.
yes it is a jatt Sikh as well as Hindu jaat surname.
Yes. It is a jatt Sikh subcaste based in doaba region of Punjab
Yes, Sokhal caste is in jatt sikh, Not kumhar.
yes there are lot of battu jatt in some part of malwa region of punjab
yes cheema is a sikh jatt surname.
Yes, Sudhan is definitely a sikh jatt surname.
yes
yes! It is a jatt sikh surname
yes it is a jatt Sikh as well as Hindu jaat surname.
Yes, Jassi is a sikh jatt surname.
SIKH BRAHMIN
Both are Sikh Surnames Jabal/Jabbal/Jubal is a Ramgarhia Sikh Surname Natt is a Jatt Sikh Surname
Yes. It is a jatt Sikh subcaste based in doaba region of Punjab
Yes, Sokhal caste is in jatt sikh, Not kumhar.
yes chakkal is a jatt sikh surname who basically hails from ropar district of punjab.
yes it is jatt's surname