i would say no
That would be your cousin so no you can't.
No, because my father's sister (my aunt) does not have any sons, she only had daughters.
Claire didn't marry anyone but she was engaged to peter and Alex was going to propose but Claire died before he could.
Fathers in Tudor England often married off their daughters to secure advantageous alliances, enhance family status, and strengthen political connections. Marriages were typically arranged to increase wealth or power, ensuring that daughters became part of influential families. Additionally, marrying daughters off could relieve economic burdens on the family and ensure the continuation of family lineage. Social norms also dictated that women were expected to marry and fulfill domestic roles, making marriage a significant aspect of a woman's life.
yup yup...i did
In Tudor times, fathers married off their daughters primarily to secure political alliances, enhance social status, and ensure economic stability. Marriages were often seen as transactions that could strengthen family ties, increase wealth, and improve land holdings. Additionally, daughters were expected to fulfill their familial duties, and marrying them off was viewed as a way to ensure their future security and that of the family. Love was often secondary to these practical considerations in the marriage arrangements of the time.
they must marry within their tribe
Yes
i dont knw about hindus, but yes u can marry ur consins..
No....She had three out of wedlock before she was asked to leave the group. The other children all have the same father, but the first three have three separate fathers.
The pharaohs would marry their girl family members or their daughters.
The colonel's daughters weren't married because they hadn't found suitable matches yet or because they chose not to marry.