The 4250 is slightly better, but it is not a huge difference. It has a clock rate of 560MHz / 40GFLOPS opposed to the 500MHz / 44.8 GFLOPS of the 4200.
To give you a better idea of how they compare, the 4200 has a Pixel filtrate of 2 GP/s, a Texture fillrate of 2 GP/s and a FP32 of 1 GP/s. Where the 4250 has a a Pixel fillrate of 2.24 GP/s, a Texture fillrate of 2.24 GP/s and a FP32 of 1 GP/s.
If you don't play graphically intensive computer games, do 3D design, or video transcoding and all you really want it to do is make GNOME or KDE or Aero look sexy, it should work just fine. They both provide full 1080p and offer UVD2.
All that said, they both support something called side port memory. The motherboard mfg can put up to 128 MB of extra memory on the motherboard that the Radeon can use for it's frame buffer. Some models have it and some do not, you would be more likely to find it on a higher end model. So take that into account with comparing boards.
Chat with our AI personalities
Its ok, nut i would reccommend a 7770 or at least a 4350.
nvidia geforce gt525m
Pixel Shader 2.0
yes
any 9xxx after and not including 9000, 9200, 9200SE, or 9250.Basically, any ATI Radeon based on the R300 generation will be the first (cheapest) ATI Radeon to support shader 2.0, including:Radeon 9550, X300Radeon 9500, 9600, X550, X600Radeon 9700, 9800More info at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_R300