Who would win a Samurai or Rajput?

Answer 1

The ninja would win in a face to face fight, and a normal assassination. whenever the ninja would defeat a samurai, he would take his swords. they practiced ninjutsu, enabling them in all areas of fighting. they could sword fight, as well as using blinding methods, illusions, shuriken, and mixed Martial Arts, giving them the hands down win.

As was their training. Ninja was the name for scouts,and spys I.E low ranking warriors. Yes some people payed to train their ninja's to be ruthless killing machines but most werent. the Ninja has been glorified because what would you rather be? a spy, a coward who hid...and was in a much lower teir then a samurai. Or a badass who can defeat 20 highly trained samurai? The only way a Ninja would win is by sneak attack or ambush.

Look up a dude named Hattori Hanzo. Born and originally trained as a samurai, but later switched up to become a ninja. He is considered the most badass warrior from back in the day and is credited with slaying several famous samurai in battle. He died of old age, according to wikepedia, but there is a legend that also says he was killed by a rival. I wanted to say the samurai were better warriors, but you have to look at the facts and pit the best of each practice against each other. Ninjas were also know to poison their weapons, some even carried rusty blades to give tetanus, as masters of deception the samurai had also a huge advantage over the ninja them self. The Samurai armour is tick and and strong, preventing few lucky samurais from being hurt to deep but the poison that ninjas used did the job in seconds. However the samurai also has a longer blade and are well skilled, with their weapons. In a fight u have to look at their advantages and diss, the samurai has thick armour were a slash can cut their armour but not make deep wounds, however poison runs deeply to the heart killing his victim in seconds or loose conscious. The Samurai has a longer reach with his katana but has no poison, but ninjas weare no armour or very little armour making it a death blow on 1 or 2 strike. Both figthers can kill each other in 1 blow as poison or fatal injury can kill the samurai or a single blow be made to the ninja. Ninjas have no armour or very little but make it up for their speed, agility and used of weapons. Unlike the samurai the ninja would retreat and hide in shadows waiting for his time to strike again, also they could use smoke bombs or black eggs (eggs filled with dust, shards of cristal and pepper making the eyes bleed causing incredible pain death in some cases) are very effective to the eyes. Traps were also used by ninjas, but note that not all ninjas were killers. Each ninja had his job, assassination, spionage, sabotage, seduction (also falls on assassination) medical specialist, smugglers and undercover also double agents. To put a more clear image of ninja vs samurai one can imagine US Army as the samurai and the ninja being NAVY SEALS. The samurai can kill the ninja, but is not very common, is mostly ninja killing samurai (Navy Seals killing Army).

Answer 2

The samurai would win. Unless the ninja could sneak attack the samurai before an actual battle could take place, the well trained samurai would easily overpower the much weaker and less trained ninja. The samurai were trained to be able to take multiple ninjas at once.

Answer 3

Argument For Rajput:

Rajput wins the duel. Samurais are great warriors but rajputs are very fierce and do not know what is fear. They are prepared to die for their country any moment. Compare them on martial arts, weapons and courage.

martial arts : samurai : jujutsu

rajput : gatka

weapons : samurai - katana, naginata, yumi, kanabao armour - leather and steel

rajput - khanda, aara, chakram, katar armour - leather and 10000 nailed armour - shield called dhal

katana and khanda are equal, naginata wins over aara, chakram and yumi are equal, chakram is fatal and yumi can be hit over a long distance, armour- rajput has a better armour of 10000 nailed and rajput wins overall because samurai lacks a shield.

courage - rajputs give their life but not their honour and nation. rana pratap fought with mughals of 84000 soldiers with 2000 canons with an rajput army of 2000 soldiers with only swords and spears. even when their army was killed rana pratap fought with the entire mughal army with one sword but did not surrender. they belong to the kshatriyas(warriors) class of indian society.

samurai : they may be trained but not as courageous as rajputs.

So the points are 3 for rajput and 2 for samurai so the winner is rajput.

Answer 4

A ninja would win because they are trained at ninjustu which enable them to quickly stun or even kill an opponet. Ninjas are also better equiped than monks are. Ninja strike fear in many people in Japan.

Answer 5

The ninjas would win any day of the week. The samurai would have three ninja stars in his armor before he could draw his sword.

Answer 6

A ninja because an assassin would not be able to find the ninja to assassinate him/her.

Answer 7

Bruce Lee eats ninjas

Answer 8

ninja