Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.
Wiki User
∙ 2017-01-10 18:46:29to be honest, i dont know the answer either :/
No.There is no evidences from the neutral historians for this claim.Only the people of the Vanniyar community are making this claim.
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
Brook means to put up with, or tolerate, so the whole thing means it doesn't have to to put up with any argument.
Begin developing a historical argument to answer the historical question
A claim is putting forth the right to something. If that claim is not settled then it might result in an argument.
A claim is putting forth the right to something. If that claim is not settled then it might result in an argument.
An argument that has not been proven is a theory or a claim.
The claim is the argument you plan to prove.
The main argument
An explanation provides information, but an argument asserts a claim.
it makes a claim about the meaning of something
It makes a claim about the effects of a specific action.
It makes a claim about the effects of a specific action.
It makes a claim about the effects of a specific action.
An argument that debates whether or not something is right or wrong
Claim