This is, of course, a matter of opinion, but there are certain points worth noting.
In the second and third movies, unlike the books they are based on, very little actually happens besides massive battle scenes. Perhaps half of the second movie, for instance, is taken up by a fight that took half a chapter to resolve in the book.
If you like massive armies and vast battles, this will suit you very well. If you prefer plot and dialog and individual heroics, the first movie is the best.
Note also that the first movie also has the highest concentration of elves, and elves are inherently awesome.
Chat with our AI personalities
It is an opinion. Some people haven't even seen the movie. Others greatly dislike it.
The movies by Peter Jackson made in 1999-2001. The Hobbit will soon come out in 2011. I believe it will be Peter Jackson's.
Personally , I preferred 'The Two Towers' because of the Siege of Helm's Deep segment and the time spent with Tree Beard .
The first ever Lord of the Rings movie was The Lord of the Rings (1978), but of the trilogy starting in 2001, the first movie was called The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.
The Hobbit, but really, you should read the silmarillion. It explains the whole Lord of the Rings Lore. but the hobbit, then the lord of the rings; Although, not all of the films for the Hobbit have come out
In the movie The Lord of the Rings, the character Arwen is played by the actress Liv Tyler.
There is no fourth Lord of the rings There is The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring2001 The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers2002 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King2003 and the Hobbit- an unexpected Journey