0
It really depends on your personal opinion of the movies. I think there were a bajillion pro's! The special effects were fantastic, the script was perfect, and I can't even begin to describe how much I love the acting (Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, Dominic Monaghan, Billy Boyd... the list goes on forever). That aside, I honestly can't think of a con.
- - - - -
Con: Arwen stole Glorfindel's horse.
- - - - -
In my opinion, it was VERY badly scripted at the end. The first thing they teach anyone writing fiction is "When you reach the end of your plot arc, stop writing." The end of the plot arc in LOTR is Frodo throwing the Ring into Mount Doom, right? Then explain the half hour of "useless junk" at the end.
- - - - -
Peter Jackson endeavored to follow Tolkien's plots as well as he could. Tolkien wrote about how things turned out for all the characters in the end (e.g. Aragorn's coronation, the parting of the Ring-Bearers, Sam's marriage, etc.) and Peter Jackson followed through as best he could. There was no "useless junk", it was only written the way Tolkien intended it to be, nothing more. Unless you're calling Tolkien's novels "useless junk", that is...
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Taiga
Fran
Jordan
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the Pros and cons for living in Massachusetts?
Pros: Its quiet and your alone Cons: Your in Massachusetts
What is the title of the first Lord of the Rings movie?
The first ever Lord of the Rings movie was The Lord of the Rings (1978), but of the trilogy starting in 2001, the first movie was called The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.
Is Lord of the Rings a myth?
Lord of the rings is not based on a true story.
What is the name of the second part of the movie Lord of the Rings?
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.
In Lord of the Rings who played Pippin?
Billy Boyd played Pippin in The Lord Of The Rings.
