It really depends on your personal opinion of the movies. I think there were a bajillion pro's! The special effects were fantastic, the script was perfect, and I can't even begin to describe how much I love the acting (Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, Dominic Monaghan, Billy Boyd... the list goes on forever). That aside, I honestly can't think of a con.
- - - - -
Con: Arwen stole Glorfindel's horse.
- - - - -
In my opinion, it was VERY badly scripted at the end. The first thing they teach anyone writing fiction is "When you reach the end of your plot arc, stop writing." The end of the plot arc in LOTR is Frodo throwing the Ring into Mount Doom, right? Then explain the half hour of "useless junk" at the end.
- - - - -
Peter Jackson endeavored to follow Tolkien's plots as well as he could. Tolkien wrote about how things turned out for all the characters in the end (e.g. Aragorn's coronation, the parting of the Ring-Bearers, Sam's marriage, etc.) and Peter Jackson followed through as best he could. There was no "useless junk", it was only written the way Tolkien intended it to be, nothing more. Unless you're calling Tolkien's novels "useless junk", that is...
Pros: Its quiet and your alone Cons: Your in Massachusetts
The first ever Lord of the Rings movie was The Lord of the Rings (1978), but of the trilogy starting in 2001, the first movie was called The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.
Lord of the rings is not based on a true story.
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.
Billy Boyd played Pippin in The Lord Of The Rings.
Pros: none Cons: Everything about purity rings
pros- your all powerful and your in control. cons-your asked everything.
pro: you are the lord. con: some people might hate you.
The physiocrats were an 18th-century group of French economists who believed in the importance of agriculture as the primary source of wealth in society. Their main pro was their focus on the natural order of the economy and the idea that wealth came from the land. However, their main con was their limited view of economic activity, as they often overlooked the role of manufacturing and trade in creating wealth. Additionally, their ideas were not always practical or easily implemented in complex modern economies.
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
pros are + and cons are-
pros: goodness cons: badness
PROS CONS ----------------------------------------------------- Pros: Entertaining Cons: Mental conditions can be caused, Adicition, Expensive.
Cons? What Cons?
What are the pros and cons of transformational leadership?
what are the pros and cons of being an architect