This remark- made at the end of the novel- comes from an American officer, not a British one, when he leads a patrol of marines onto the beach to rescue the stranded schoolboys.
His remark is aimed at contrasting the high reputation that English public schoolboys have for maturity, level-headedness, and generally exemplary standards of behaviour, with the savage, bestial state that the lads have descended into during their time on the island. When Lord of the Flies was written, in the mid-1950s, Britain was still an Empirical power. Although it was declining on the international stage from the height of it's power in the early 20th Century, it still carried at least as much (if not more) influence in world politics and culture as the USA. The 'model Englishman' was the ideal standard to which the British establishment believed all other nations and civilisations should aspire, and the state of a nation's development was measured by the extent to which it was believed it had embraced English values, manners and behaviour. And the English public schoolboy was seen to be the 'model Englishman' of tomorrow- he was supposed to live up to all the expectations invested in him by the 'mother country', embodying decency, civilization and fair play.
Fifty years ago, even new Superpowers such as the USA looked up to the English reputation for decency, and expected this to be reflected even in the behaviour of it's young adolescent gentlemen. The American officer is shocked to see such lads- who have a reputation around the world for being the epitomy of the civilised young man- reduced to the state of tribal African savages, possessed by the primeval bestiality that lies at the very opposite of the scale.
The rescue of the surviving English schoolboys by a detachment of US marines is a metaphor for what was then Britain's declining dominance of the world stage in contrast to the rise of a renewed, confident USA as a global superpower. The exhausted, terrified, filthy boys, wearing rags and broken spectacles and fighting amongst themselves, symbolise the shattered state of postwar Britain being rescued by the clean, disciplined, advanced new United States.
(N.B. it is worth remembering though, that whatever symbolism was intended in Lord Of The Flies, in reality much of America's new technologies were first developed by the British! But I digress....)
Becasue he is confronted by a group of virtually naked little boys who are sobbing noisily and have confessed that two other boys have been killed. As an officer in the British Royal Navy is is embarrassed to witness their tears both for himself and on their behalf too, as well brought up British boys should keep a stiff upper lip and should not cry. The boys are not conforming to the rules of the game.
3 years - at the end of the contract the COR files should be turned over to the Contracting Officer
This is about East Northumberland High I am flying in the sky I am high This is about East Northumberland High I am up by the kites This dope really does me good Better than i thought it should
Should not conduct an in-process inspection
There is no RF mentioned.....I always thought it should be "naturally".
The officer is expressing disappointment in the boys' behavior and their descent into savagery despite being raised in a seemingly civilized society. He expected British boys to behave more rationally and morally, but their actions on the island did not meet his expectations.
They both thought that the French were vulgar and incapable of ruling. They thought that either the Americans or the British should rule.
The colonists were British citizens and took part in the war( Washington was a British officer) and the crown felt that they should help pay for the war. Hence taxes were levied for the colonies contributions to pay down the war debt. One of the things people have a tendency to forget is they were British and thought of themselves as British.
British parliament thought the colonists should pay the cost of the war that is why the British parliament thought this war that the french would win in the war.
This is hypocritical because he's talking about how they could of done alot better, but really, he's the one that's fighting in the war.
Any will do, you can even gain your qualifications in the army!
Because he thought that the colonists should pay there debts with British
Well, a police officer should be in physical shape not only to chase down "bad guys", but also to be in a better state of mind. Its a fact that people who are in shape are in better moods. As far as physical training a police officer should run, weight train, and generally be in good physical shape.
If the officer reasonably believes the warrant is valid, then the officer is protected from any legal (or civil) consequence. However, the key phrase to that is "the officer reasonably believes".If someone manages to prove that the officer "should have known better", or that the officer lied in order to have the warrant issued, the officer can be held liable, as they knew the warrant was invalid.
i like ur sex -----no he did not lol, il tell you what he did he was disgusted at the way they acted, because they killed two boys and didnt even know how many of them were altogether. Furthermore he sas how "BRITISH boys should have shown a better show" P 202
YESAdded: They had better carefully check the conditions of their release and be sure they don't have any travel restrictions.And: They had better get prior written permission from their parole officer.
The British try to recover their war spending by that they thought the colonists should help pay for the cost of defending the colonies. The colonists didn't like the British government by telling them to stay out of those lands.