If no one has heard of them, no one will care what they have to say about art.
If no one has heard of them, no one will care what they have to say about art.
Only the person viewing the work can decide for himself or herself if it's "art" - we all have different likes and dislikes. Critics may say that such and such is "Good" or "Bad", but you really have to decide for yourself.
It collapses into Act-Utilitarianism.
Art history is exactly what it sounds like: the history of art. Although, since the meaning "art" is a gray area, it would be safe to say that art history encompasses the history of visual culture....
That they invade public space. (Apex)
If no one has heard of them, on one will care what they have to say about art.
If no one has heard of them, no one will care what they have to say about art.
If no one has heard of them, no one will care what they have to say about art.
If no one has heard of them, no one will care what they have to say about art.
If no one has heard of them, no one will care what they have to say about art.
the answer is b.) if no one has heard of them, no one will care what they have to say about art.
all Japanese food is a work of art, or so the food critics say but mainly Japanese food art can mean that it looks like a work of art, like it usually does, or that it tastes scrumptious
Some critics say that "globalization" really means "Americanization" and that exposure to American values and products _____ other cultures
the critics say that he cares about slavery and he wants to save them
the critics say that he cares about slavery and he wants to save them
the critics say that he cares about slavery and he wants to save them