yes
Realistic fiction is a sub genre of fiction that contains stories that are fictional, but could have occurred in real life. Films that feature realistic fiction include The Fault in Our Stars (adapted from the novel of the same title, written by John Green), and To Kill a Mockingbird (adapted from Harper Lee's popular novel).
Instead of focusing on how to paint, abstract artists began to think about the endless options of what they could paint
You could do an Internet search for "David Banner shirtless," and images will likely appear.
You could look up a picture on google images...I don't know why there wouldn't be one there.
One can find photos of Breanne Ashley on Google Images. One could also find the pictures as well as the biography of Breanne Ashley by using the Internet Movie Database.
The opposite of realistic (in appearance) could be abstract, or surrealistic. The opposite of realistic (reasonable, practical) could be unrealistic, impractical, or infeasible.
I don't think their is a verb for realistic but I could be wrong
The British Florin was Two Shillings or one-tenth of a Pound. Many of the British Empire/Commonwealth countries also used the Florin. The modern Florin, not to be confused with English medieval Florin or any of the European Florins, was first issued in 1848 as a tentative step towards decimalisation, and last issued in 1967. Since the Florin has long been out of circulation, an exchange rate is not possible, but at one-tenth of a Pound, you could equate it to one-tenth of a Dollar, or 10 cents US.
Artists were influenced by the invention of the camera, because it gave them a cropped composition. It also showed the tonal effects of light and dark in much finer detail; making it easier for artists to capture the tone in their compositions.
it could be.
A book that is fiction, but can happen in real life is a realistic fiction book.
Realistic fiction is classified by seeing things that could really happen yet is made up.
Realistic fiction is a story that could actually happen but the author made up.
note: this is a personal thought But i think it was important so that the artist's audience or viewer could relate to what emotions where being shown through the artwork.
it could have happened but it didn't
The Bayeux Tapestry tells a medieval story, scene by scene, so yes, you could say it is realistic.
That's more of an opinion than a real question but how they may come of as not realistic is because they are virtual and a toy, not actual animals. But if they COULD make it realistic, then that question is up to Ganz.