The historian makes a counterclaim.
it is a historian.
Which of these people is not famous historian
Peter Mansfield - historian - died in 1996.
A liberal historian believes historical events are led by individuals and political leaders, as opposed to a revisionist historian who believes events are led by mass movement of people or ideas.
A historian's interpretation can be influenced by their personal biases, cultural background, political beliefs, and the available evidence. Additionally, the historian's education, research methods, and the historical context in which they are working can also shape their interpretation.
true
If the question is: A historian is writing a book about the fall of the Soviet Union. He claims that the country collapsed because it spent too much of its money on its military rather than providing domestic services to its people. What is the best way to determine whether the historianβs interpretation is valid? Then the answer would be: Corroborate the interpretation with other secondary sources.
The historian makes a counterclaim.
The historian makes a counterclaim.
The historian makes a counterclaim.
The historian makes a counterclaim.
The historian makes a counterclaim.
Hell yeah
True.
A historian's upbringing can influence their interpretation of historical events; for example, a Jewish historian may have a more negative view of World War Two than another, due to the events (Jewish persecution) that took place during that time in history.
Because the men at the constitutional convention never considered getting rid of slavery