Human readable can only be understood by human beings where as Machine readable is in Binary format and could only be understoood by machines. (eg. computers) The only way to understand machine readable is if the data is processed and output into human readable form by means of an output device :)
Chat with our AI personalities
output devices that produced hard or soft copies of information or data that can be read and interpreted by humans, while Machine readable devices are those that output in a form only a computer can process.
Metadata refers to the data that is readable by the machine. The human-readable medium refers to the medium that is readable by the human beings.
compiling - automated machine translation of high order human readable program code to low level machine readable program code.debugging - manual human analysis of program failures to track down incorrectly coded operations that are the root cause of the program failure.
Compiling is the act of translating human-readable source code to machine-readable byte code.In Java, the compiler program is javac
Any document that a human can read and understand without requiring an interpreter (it is written in the reader's native language, for instance). Machine code is not human-readable, it is intended to be read by a machine. Assembler language is a symbolic language that is essentially a human-readable form of machine code, however it's not easily understood by everyone except those familiar with Assembler language. High-level languages are more easily understood by most programmers, particularly those familiar with the language, while pseudocode is an abstract language intended to be human-readable even by non-programmers.
No. Machines do not understand XML any more than they understand the works of Shakespeare. XML documents must be interpreted by a machine-code program that understands the meaning of the XML structure.
Sentry-Human guard or literally turret Turret-Machine designed for protection, fires a gun.