answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

a logical fallacy

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

BRESLIN MOORE

Lvl 1
3y ago
thank you today this answer still works you will probably never see this but you clutched up my final exam the last question if i get it wrong i fail if i get it right i pass i get this question and you clutched it thank you 

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which of these is an error in reasoning?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

A is basically an error in reasoning?

fallacy


A fallacy is basically an?

A fallacy is basically an error in reasoning.


Which fallacy occurs when there is an error in inductive or deductive reasoning?

mazda


How did huygens Initial error affect the rest of his reasoning?

He didn't have scientific evidence.


What is a part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning.?

A common error in reasoning that can make an argument invalid is known as a logical fallacy. These are flaws in the logical structure of an argument that can mislead or deceive the audience. Examples of logical fallacies include ad hominem attacks, appeal to authority, and circular reasoning.


What is the part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?

That would be a moot point


Is a part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?

Yes, a flawed part of an argument constitutes an error in reasoning which can render the overall argument invalid or weak. Common errors in reasoning include logical fallacies, false premises, inconsistencies, and incorrect assumptions. Identifying and addressing these errors is crucial for building sound and persuasive arguments.


Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it?

Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.


Why is a deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?

Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to definite results. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations, leaving room for uncertainty and error in the conclusions drawn. Deductive reasoning follows a more structured and logical process, while inductive reasoning relies more on probabilities and patterns.


What is logically fallacy?

A logical fallacy is, roughly speaking, an error of reasoning. When someone adopts a position, or tries to persuade someone else to adopt a position, based on a bad piece of reasoning, they commit a fallacy


What has the author Ernest Terrence Alderdice written?

Ernest Terrence Alderdice has written: 'Analysis of error performance on a test for abstract reasoning' -- subject(s): Testing, Reasoning (Psychology), Shipley-Institute of Living Scale


A theorm is easily disproved?

A theorem is a statement that has been proven to be true using logic and mathematical reasoning. If a theorem is disproved, it means that there is a mistake in the proof or the assumptions made. This requires revisiting the reasoning and identifying where the error occurred.