The car in the back is usually at fault in a rear end collision. The only exception would be if the car in front were backing up. The car in back is at fault for hitting you ,but if you are pushed into the car in front of you you are at fault for hitting that car.
First, you shouldn't be cutting people off. Whom ever hit the other car from behind would be at fault.
the car that hit you in the rear is at fault. think about it this way. What did you do wrong if you were stopped
When ever a person hits the car in front of them, they are found at fault. If you hit a car in the rear even though it stops short, you are at fault. You will probably get a ticket and your insurance will go up.
Nothing, if she as at fault she is responsible to the damages of her car.
If he was truly stationary and you hit him, you are probably at fault. If he was illegally going through the turn, he might be at fault.
If you hit a car from behind, you are going to be held to be at fault. If a car hits you from behind, they are going to be held at fault. Most jurisdictions consider hitting the back of a car prima facia evidence that you were following too closely. You could literally have six cars at fault in this case, each one for hitting the one in front of it.
The driver who hit it.
Car B would be at fault do to the fact that they failed to yield at a traffic light.
In my state you are responsible for the person you hit whether its really your fault or even the fault of the person in front of you. Percentages? Who knows, the insurance companies will fight that one out and probably you too.
What ever car was turning is at fault unless they had a green arrow. you have the right away when it comes to 4 way stops with the turn lights.. if the turn light isn't on then they have to wait for you.
The car that hit you from behind is at fault.