Theft is not the same as accidents. If you drive a car, whether it is in your name or someone else's name, and you have an accident, then your own insurance is applicable, but if someone else's car is stolen, that doesn't seem to involve you. Presumably you were not in the car when it was stolen, right? What involvement do you have?
If you have theft insurance with your policy, yes. It should not matter where your vehicle was stolen.
You must have comprehensive coverage in order to recover on a claim from your insurance company if your vehicle is stolen. Liability only is just that, liability for your legal liability for damage or injuries to others.
The second vehicle will be covered by it's own insurance. That company will then attempt to sue the driver to recoup it's losses
You or your insurance company. The owner of the stolen vehicle would not be responsible because their vehicle was stolen and the driver of the stolen vehicle's insurance would not cover it because he was driving a vehicle that was not on his policy and he did not have permission to drive.
If it is being used as a replacement for your vehicle, because your vehicle can not be used because it is broken down, need of service or stolen, it is covered. If not, it most likely is not.
No, cash is not covered, same on homeowners policy, not covered.
No, Money stolen from your Financial Institution is covered by your Financial Institution
no
Either.
No. It covered under a motorcycle policy.
Nope, That's what auto Insurance is for.
No. Normally personal property stolen from a vehicle is covered by the contents coverage of your homeowner's or renters insurance. But in many homeowners and renter's policies there is a severe limit on the amount of cash covered or it may be excluded altogether.