Full coverage requirements have nothing to do with the age of the car. If you still make payments on the car then you still have to have full coverage. If you own the car outright, then you do not have to have it.
The full coverage of the old car is approximately $60 to $100. It gonna be cheaper if you negated with them. New car is approximately $150 to $200.
If the car you have is new, it is safer to go with full coverage. If it is old there is likely little reason to bother paying for more than liability coverage.
only if you have full coverage insurance and the reason for the rental is due to an insurance claim- such as an accident.
only if you are renting due to an accident and have full coverage insurance
How old the car is has nothing to do with it. The only time a car is REQUIRED to have FULL COVERAGE is when a car is being financed. In other words, a bank gives you a loan. Why? Because liability only fixes the other persons car, and if you get in a wreck, the bank will never get their money back from the car. I have owned ~5 cars in my life, financed one, and had full coverage insurance on it. Every other car has been liability only. So again, the age of a car has nothing to do with qualifying for liability insurance. If its being paid for with a bank loan, you need full coverage, if the car is paid off, you can get liability.
Unless you have alot of money don't get your 16 year old a car that will require full coverage. Even with good student discounts and longevity with an insurance company, you will likely pay 2000 to 4000 per year. And if they get into a wreck, might as well just get them a bike.
There are different coverages under an auto insurance policy like the liablity coverage,-(PPI) comprehensive coverage and collision. You switched the insurance and so the new car has only the coverage which you had opted for in your old car which might have been only the liablity - mandatory coverage. Thus technically you had insuracne coverage sufficent to abide to your state rules but your car was not covered for own damges of comprehnsive damage to the car. Hence the insurance company is saying that you do not have coverage. Please check your insurance coverage when you buy a new car and upgrade the same.
On a car? If it is old, then no. If it is new, I suggest you get full coverage because it will cost less to fix it than replace it. If you finance any portion of the loan in which the car is having a lien on it, you will need to protect the collateral and the bank will require a full coverage policy.
that is relay up to you, i have a 1997 ford ranger with 255,000 miltes ,i use it everyday with full coverage. Just remember if i get hit and car totalled, the check from insurance won't be enough to replace it. Most people drop full coverage after the vehicle gets 10 years old just strickly for financial reasons.
Classic car insurance is for "classic" or older model cars, whereas basic car insurance is a minimum coverage insurance for normal cars. Classic cars are cars that are at least 20 years old but not more than 40 years old.
If by 50 car insurance, you mean you are considering switching to car insurance for those over 50 years old, it would not be a bad idea if you qualify. You can often get discounts on car insurance with the same coverage.