Old cars are made from older metals (alloys) that were a little more dangerous but actually safer than today's cars. today's cars have different materials used to build them such as fiber glass and plastic but what today's modern cars have that older cars don't are airbags, side airbags, Saturn's are equipped with engines that drop for your safety. but older cars if they were hit the metal was so strong that it didn't even effect the driver but the downfall of and older car is the interior which if you go in a head on collision the older models weren't equipped with airbags therefore if you got hit and you face hit the steering wheel the impact would shatter every bone in your face so thank God for airbags lol but I'm sure there are a lot more answers for your question but hopefully i could have helped you.
Edit: Older cars being made of stronger metal was not a good thing (As this fool has written above XD just kidding, but it is wrong >:(
Safety features used in modern cars include crumple zones, the fronts of cars particularly are purposely made to crumple.
This absorbs the energy of the crash by reducing the acceleration of the car/increasing the collision time. As acceleration = V2-V1/ time, and the time of collision is increased by the crumple zones, this will, in turn decrease the acceleration.
So, this means the force on the passenger(s) is less, because Force = Mass * Acceleration.
This can also be thought of as spreading the force on the passenger over a longer period of time, meaning the passenger takes less of the force at once.
V2 = velocity after crash (0)
V1 = velocity before crash (i.e. 50mph)
Time = How long the collision lasted (i.e. No crumple zone could be 0.05 seconds, while a crumple zone could make it last as long as 0.2 seconds, this will make a major difference to the injuries caused by a crash)
# Weight # size # thickness of body panels
your really stupid
Safety-wise, new cars put old cars to shame. Completely the opposite when talking about style and innovation. Anyways, here are a list of safety mechanisms that are non-existent in older cars (older meaning 1970 and older). Safe Innovations: -Airbags of all types -Three point restraint seatbelts (Invented by Volvo) -Traction control systems -Limit slip differentials -Power brakes -Anti-locking brakes -Halogen and xenon headlight bulbs -Layered windshields -Headlight wipers -Windshield wipers that actually work well -Crumpling impact zones -Box frames and structural roll cages -Fire retardant fabrics. Truly the only advantage that an old car has in a collision is it's sheer weight and pure steel construction. Otherwise, they seem like deathtraps compared to modern cars.
The use of old cars or cars with insufficient safety and security technology such as pressure monitoring systems. Being fatigue behind the wheel is almost as bad as being drunk.
The biggest improvement in the new cribs from the old ones is the safety. Over the years, the safety of the cribs have greatly increased.
Advancements in aerodynamics and in chassis have balanced out the cars today compared to in older times.
Old no seat belts airbags so overall safety not very good!
THATS SIMPLE OLD WERE not so good to commmunecate as new modern things are better
Old cars, although very cool, were not nearly as safe as they are today. Old cars up to the mid 1980's were carbureted, new cars are fuel injected. Many of the old cars didn't come with seat belts, now it is required. New cars have newer technology, and better features than old cars. Old cars came fast stock, new cars come slower for safety. Old cars were built for power, and they weren't designed to hold back emissions. New cars have to pass emissions from the factory. Essentailly, old cars were round, large, and sucked down gas (5 MPG). New cars are square, small, and use like 40 MPH.
Old cars have the carburettor. Modern cars now have electronic fuel injection system
it cost over 200 dollars
Cars safety rules say 12+ but I was sitting in the front when i was 10