You can automatically be At Fault in an auto accident if you are the only driver involved; you were the driver who was not obeying the speed limit; if you were the driver who was not using safe driving rules; if you were breaking a law; if you were impaired. The most common cause for automatically being at fault is driving too close to the car ahead of you for the speed you are going and driving over the speed limit. None of these conditions are 100% automatically your fault but very close to that, especially if others involved in the accident were not doing any of the above.
No, if you were negligent, and 'at fault' you still are, however, if they leave the scene doesn't sound like you will have to fix their vehicle, but you could still have a 'chargeable' accident on your policy.
Yes, because you
No, one can bring an action for personal injury resulting from an automobile within 2 years of the accident. No, one can bring an action for personal injury resulting from an automobile within 2 years of the accident.
that will be on there for three years
An unlicensed driver will probably get cited for not having a license and may even get their car impounded, but is not automatically at fault. The person that the police and insurance company determine caused the accident would be at fault.
The insurers of the driver who was deemed to be at fault for the accident.
If you are involved in an automobile accident caused by another driver, and that driver carries no insurance, your no-fault clause is designed to protect your financial interests.
Jeffrey O'Connell has written: 'The injury industry and the remedy of no-fault insurance' -- subject(s): Automobile Insurance, Insurance, No-fault automobile, Law and legislation, Liability for traffic accidents, No-fault, United States 'Payment for pain & suffering' -- subject(s): Automobile Insurance, Compensation (Psychology), Damages, Medical jurisprudence, Pain, Personal injuries, Public opinion, Suffering 'The injury industry and the remedy of no-fault auto insurance' -- subject(s): Insurance, No-fault automobile, Liability for traffic accidents 'The Lawsuit Lottery' -- subject(s): Accident Insurance, Accident law, Actions and defenses 'Five 20th century college presidents'
The person who causes the accident is at fault
No. Just the fact of being unlicensed does not mean that the driver did something that caused the accident. Being unlicensed is what is called a non-moving violation. Another violation of this type may be not having a current registration tag on the vehicle. Just because you don't have a tag on your car doesn't automatically make you at fault for someone hitting your car. Fault for the accident will have to be determined by the police officers after they investigate the scene and take statements from witnesses. The person who is driving without a drivers license will get a ticket for not being licensed and then whoever was at fault will receive a violation for whatever they did to cause the accident.
GAP coverage applies regardless of fault.
No, he was killed in an automobile accident on December 21, 1945.