It very much depends on time or century you are talking about.In the most glorious times the Spartans used bronze armor,with helmet,breastplate,greaves,and most importantly shield.And additional armor was thigh armor,shoulder,lower arm,groin plate,foot armor...The Athenians would use the same armor types,only probably in less numbers because they,unlike Spartans,had to provide themselves with the whole panoplia/armor set.And it was expensive..So in Athens a new,light,linen and leather armor appeared around the end of 6th century BC.It was cheaper and served good enough.We don't have any proof Spartans ever used this type.
Chat with our AI personalities
NO the fought butt naked so it gave them no advantage. all they wore was a helmet cape ,shield, sword and spear
Very wrong answer above.Going to hand to hand combat without armor is no advantage.Spartans were know in archaic and early classical times for being heavily armed men.Their armor was the most complete in all Greek cities. So yes they wore a lot of it.
In multiplayer it is to show which team the player is on. And in lone wolves to show which player the person is. In campaign Spartans could have customized armor, especially the Spartan IIIs, so red armor could be one of those customizations.
the spartans had more of a war like government whereas athens was education oriented.
Granite armor is the best armor to wear with 51 defence members.
The Athenian government was trying to be a democracy but did not succeed. The Spartans government was entirely different. The Spartans had an Oligarchy and a Monarchy. An Oligarchy is a government or council ruled by few people.
Spartans were committed to military service because they were supported by serfs who worked the farms. Athenians were committed to earning their living, with military service part time, for training and being called out when necessary.