YOU CAN TRY TO GO THROUGH THEIR HOMEOWNERS POLICY, BUT IF THEY DENY IT, YOU MAY HAVE TO GO THROUGH YOUR INS UNDER COMPREHENSIVE DAMAGE. THIS IS DIFFERENT THAN COLLISION AND MOST TIMES HAS A MUCH LOWER DEDUCTIBLE.
No, that's what car insurance is for. If someone hit your car, that person is the one liable for your damages, not the property owner where it was parked.
Neighbor gets new window and you pay. (You caused damage, intentional or not). An apology for the inconvenience is nice, and can go a long way to keeping it all courteous too.
The owner of the illegally parked vehicle may be ticketed, but the "at fault" driver is responsible for the damages to the parked vehicle.
if "your" vehicle has NO insurence, you are not entitled to compensation...meaning...you get nothing..and the fact that it was parked in a "public place" makes for an even stronger agument against any suit seeking damages.
A parked car almost never crashes into others or does anything else that prevents other drivers on private property from stopping in time to avoid hitting it. Therefore, the fact that it may be "illegally parked" usually has nothing to do with why someone negligently crashed into it.
The person who caused the damage.
The car that was moving when they struck each other...
If someone hits a parked car then they are automatically liable.
your car is parked unless you have someway or another had the car in drive while you weren't in it then how can you pay for damages you did not incur and if you weren't parked in a no parking zone or a handicap spot then the person who hit you is responsible for all damages because they weren't paying any attention
Assuming the parking lot was open, and the car had every right to be parked there. The owner of the snowplow, and possibly the operator of it would be liable for damages to the parked car.
The owner of the parked car is at fault if they open their door into traffic. Their insurance should pay for the damages to the driving car.
Yes it is theft and they are liable for damages