Entirely situation dependent. Need to know which vehicle had right-of-way in order to determine this.
To tell you the truth, You both are at fault. If you go to court, usually they will tell you that it's the person that didn't have the right - of - way's fault.
Yes. If the passenger is hurt in an accident caused by the driver, the passenger is fully entitled to sue the driver. In fact even if the passenger is a spouse of the driver, the passenger can sue.
The injured party should seek compensation from the driver of whichever vehicle was at fault for the accident.
I don't think you can get a ticket for that reason, it was the driver's fault that he forgot his license, not yours.
Not enough info here to give an opinion. Usually rear end collisions are the fault of the stiking driver however there are circumstances when the stuck driver is at fault such as failure to yield , failure to stop or improper lane change etc. The investigating officer will determine who is at fault or a traffic court judge will.
Probably, but the defense will argue that the passenger contributed to his injuries by not wearing the seat belt which the driver provided.
If the taxi driver was in the middle of the road then it wold be the taxi driver fault but if the taxi was on the side of the road then the dumb taxi driver should know that the rule is to open on the right side either way! duhhhhhhhhhhhhh
It would depend upon the circumstances. If the passenger is a fully functioning adult, then yes, it would likely be the passenger's fault. If, however, the passenger was under the charge of the adult driver (such as a young child, or an adult with diminished mental capacity), then it could be argued that the driver created the circumstances in which the crash was liable to occur by placing the passenger in the front seat, and the driver could therefore be found to be at least partially at fault.
Generally the car making the movement, in this case 'A', will be the driver found at fault.
driver 2 Probably Driver 1, the driver making a right turn is usually considered to have the right of way.
only if the passenger contributed to the accident (smoking marijuana causing the driver to get high via second hand, distracting the driver, etc) and can be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
No. For example if a driver stops at green light and the driver to his rear hits him, it is the driver in front's fault.