The vehicle At Fault would normally use their insurance. If their insurance does not cover the damage or the police considered the accident a non fault, the car stopped at the light will have to pay for their own vehicle.
You should have insurance whether it is your fault or not.
It depends on the situation. If you stoped short and got rear ended it is your fault. But if you stoped becasue the driver in front of you stoped then it is that persons fault. If you are sitting at a stop light and get rear ended it is there fault. If you are parked in a parking zone and get rear ended it is there fault. Hope this Helped
I just had a similar situation, the bike rider ran through a red light in the dark with no headlight when I was going through on a green light. He ended up with a rod & plate in his leg. I was not at fault, but Florida, being a no fault state, and the bike rider having no medical coverage and being an unisured auto owner & me being insured makes my insurance company responsible. Plus I can be held liable for anything beyond what my coverage is or if the bike rider won't accept my insurance company's offer. If the bike rider has car insurance, his car insurance should cover his injuries. The bike is considered a vehicle, just like a car & must abide by the same rules.
if you ran the red light, the police and insurance company will almost always find you at fault. you did not have the right of way at that intersection.
Whose At Fault?That sounds rather unusual. I have never heard of an insurance company assigning fault and not paying out the claim. If by chance you mean that you were making a legal, left arrow green type of turn, and the other car ran the light and you collided with the car that ran the light, the car that ran the light would be at fault. I would definitely look into the fact the at-fault insurance has assigned fault to the other driver but refuses to pay out damages for your vehicle. Remember, if you feel an insurance company isn't acting within the law, contact your state's department of insurance in order to file complaints, start grievance procedures (the complaint process) among other things.
Probably, but the other guy's insurance company should cover it since he was liable (unless it was a hit and run).
the at fault drivers insurance is obligated to pay for damages the insured caused up to the specified policy limits.
you should be able to get any type of car insurance you need. because Pennsylvania is a no fault state so disability should not matter when choosing from the different insurance companys. The reason I know this is because I was hit by another motorist whom ran a light and I still had to pay to get my car fixed
If he was at fault, regardless of whether he was pulling a camper or not, he would be responsible. Pulling a camper doesnt make you responsible for an accident if that was the only thing you did wrong. If someone rear-ended him, its their fault, if he rear ended someone or ran a red light, then yes, its his fault.
The police officer is simply there to take the statement not to say whos at fault. The insurance company will decide who is at fault. Normally they will find that one one is at fault if no one admits fault. The case will simply be a dud. Neither party will get paid and each will have to cover the cost of the accident.
It is driver B's fault because you now that driver A should stop because other cars are already driving so he should of stopped instead of you keep going
It should if your insurance company finds out about it before your renewal.