If the accident was caused by the uninsured driver than the uninsured driver is definitely still responsible.
No. The state is not responsible for the accident or the driver. You can file suit against the uninsured motorist.
The vehicle owner is responsible for 100% of the damages. They can let anyone drive their vehicle as long as they have a valid license (being uninsured is not a factor), but if they turn their vehicle over to an unlicensed driver, the insurance company will not pay that claim.
If your insurance covers someone else driving your car, no problem. If not, it's your car and you are legally responsible for whatever damage there is. In other words, you are responsible because you loaned him the car.
The underaged driver's parents are responsible for the damage to the car.
No. A cosigner is just responsible for paying it off if the negligent driver wrecks it and and can't work to make the payments.
Are you sure that that's driver and not just a queer example of nondriver? Yes I am sure it is driver
No. It's insured by the repossesor. Matter of fact if he wrecks it he has to pay.
That driver will need to have insurance. You need to call your local agent and ask him this question. You may or may not be covered, and may or may not be responsible for damages. You are truly on a slippery slope.
who ever's name is on the note. you may have to take them to small claims court.
It means that the driver is not a responsible driver. Does not hold him/herself accountable for his/her actions while on the road. Drivers like this often cause wrecks or dangerous situations to happen while on the road. Drivers like this should never have received his/her license and probably got it out of a cereal box.
This is often a means for the insurance company to cash in on both sides of the claim. If the uninsured driver caused the collision then they need to be charged by the police or the party who was hit needs to request charges pressed against the party at fault and this needs to go through court, in the mean while the insurance company needs to be told that they cant proceed until the trial is completed and a judgment handed out by the courts. In the case of one State or Province having one insurance company this is often done to settle claims faster and double end the cost to two drivers or two insured parties. There is no such thing as a no fault motor vehicle incident, someone is always at fault and the police should be involved so that no one gets hosed by the insurance company. Dont settle call a lawyer