No, if the facts of loss occurred just as you described them, you wouldn't be considered At Fault. The key here is the lead vehicle driver's statement. Specifically, did he/she feel one impact (from your car being pushed into his), or did he feel two impacts (which would indicate you rear-ended the lead vehicle first, and then you in turn were rear-ended). But, just because your car made contact with the lead vehicle doesn't mean you're automatically at-fault. More input from FAQ Farmers: * Depends.... If the "Proximate Causer" can be determined and identified, he/she can be held accountable. Need to be fully substantiated as the proximate cause by non-interested witnesses. ie: Car enters your lane on one way street going the wrong way forcing you to swerve to avoid head-on collion. If you can catch and identify that vehicle they will be held accountable.
It is their fault.
if the car that hit you from behind has insurace its his fault, for failing to leave enough breaking distance, even thought he was hit, u claim from him,, he claims from the car that shoved him and so on
The car who reversed and hit the other car is the car at fault. It is important to gather witness statements in this case to submit to police and insurance.
Most likely it will be considered your fault.
If the police report indicates the driver of the car was at fault, you may have a case.
At least partially.
The driver who rear ended you is at fault.
You are! For not being cautious when reversing on to a road. You should make sure that it is safe and clear when reversing, if you hit another car it is your fault and not the person that is driving on the roads fault.
The person who hit a parked vehicle is at fault.
Answer: The vehicle that initiates the collision is at fault.
If you are in reverse and hit anything, moving or not, you are at fault.
It is almost impossible to assign fault to a parked car, even if it is illegally parked.