answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Lamarck led the way for and had ideas that helped Darwin. However, his observations regarding the mechanisms of evolution were, with the exception of one, totally backwards.

To summarize Lamarck, he hypothesized that organisms somehow had a choice in their traits and could change to fit the environment (he called these ideas his theories of need and his theory of use and disuse). The part he was correct on was that should an organism change, they would pass the traits on to their offspring.

Darwin said, basically, the opposite. Darwin observed that organisms were born with slight differences (variations) and those variations might give some members of a species an advantage in the struggle to survive in the environment. The reward for survival was that the organism got to reproduce and pass those traits on to their offspring. Of course, the offspring might show some variation and the whole process would continue to repeat.

However, the bottom line with Darwin (and contrary to Lamarck) was that an organism had no choice in its traits as an organism is born with or without the advantage. Darwin, without knowing its mechanisms, recognized that genetics played a part in evolution.

Darwin died not knowing of Mendel's work on genetics which, of course, substantiates Darwin's theory.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did scientists reject Lamark's idea of evolution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why do sociologists and scientists reject the idea of biological races?

Sociologists and scientists reject the idea of biological races because there is no scientific basis for race as a biological construct. Genetic variation between individuals is continuous and does not align neatly with traditional racial categories. Additionally, race is a social concept with a history of being used to justify discrimination and inequality.


Why did the early man scholars reject fossils as a mean to trace human evolution?

Early man scholars rejected fossils as a means to trace human evolution because they held religious or cultural beliefs that contradicted the idea of human evolution. Additionally, fossils were not well understood or widely accepted as evidence of human ancestry at the time.


When was the theory of evolution discovered?

The theory of evolution was proposed by Charles Darwin in his book "On the Origin of Species" published in 1859. However, the idea of evolution had been discussed by earlier naturalists and scientists before Darwin.


What common idea about organisms did these scientists share?

These scientists shared the idea that organisms change over time through the process of evolution. They believed that organisms are adapted to their environment through natural selection, a mechanism proposed by Charles Darwin.


What proof is there for human evolution?

Well scientists believe that we evolved from the Apes, think of the era of the cave men that might give you some idea of what i mean.


What did Copernicus not reject?

Copernicus did not reject the idea that planetary orbits around our Sun were circular.


What did early scientists before Darwin contributed to the study of evolution?

Early scientists before Darwin contributed to the study of evolution by proposing ideas that laid the foundation for evolutionary theory. For example, Lamarck proposed the idea of inheritance of acquired traits, while Cuvier demonstrated the concept of extinction. These contributions helped shape the understanding of evolution prior to Darwin's theory of natural selection.


Scientists have fossil evidence for which idea for the origin of life?

Scientists have fossil evidence supporting the idea that life originated from simple, single-celled organisms that emerged over 3.5 billion years ago. Fossils of these early microorganisms, such as cyanobacteria, provide insights into the evolution of life on Earth.


Did catholics reject the idea of infant baptism?

Catholics did not reject the idea of infant baptism. Catholics have been baptizing eight-day old infants for a very long time.


What is naturalistic evolution?

Theistic evolution is the idea that God intervenes to guide the course of evolution. Naturalistic evolution makes no mention of God. Naturalistic evolution is the idea that evolution is a normal result of natural processeses. Naturalistic evolution is compatible with both atheism, and compatible with the idea of a God that can set in motion self-sufficient processes that work without any need for ongoing intervention.


Why did the parlement reject Louis idea?

Because they thought it was not good enough


What is the name of the philosophy that reject the idea of universal values?

Relativism or Relativity