Lamarck led the way for and had ideas that helped Darwin. However, his observations regarding the mechanisms of evolution were, with the exception of one, totally backwards.
To summarize Lamarck, he hypothesized that organisms somehow had a choice in their traits and could change to fit the environment (he called these ideas his theories of need and his theory of use and disuse). The part he was correct on was that should an organism change, they would pass the traits on to their offspring.
Darwin said, basically, the opposite. Darwin observed that organisms were born with slight differences (variations) and those variations might give some members of a species an advantage in the struggle to survive in the environment. The reward for survival was that the organism got to reproduce and pass those traits on to their offspring. Of course, the offspring might show some variation and the whole process would continue to repeat.
However, the bottom line with Darwin (and contrary to Lamarck) was that an organism had no choice in its traits as an organism is born with or without the advantage. Darwin, without knowing its mechanisms, recognized that genetics played a part in evolution.
Darwin died not knowing of Mendel's work on genetics which, of course, substantiates Darwin's theory.
Well scientists believe that we evolved from the Apes, think of the era of the cave men that might give you some idea of what i mean.
The Galapagos Islands.
The Galapagos Islands is where he came up with the idea of natural selection.
The theory of evolution by natural selection. Called gradualism.
Charles Darwin is best known for his work on the theory of evolution, outlined in his book "On the Origin of Species" published in 1859. Darwin proposed the idea of natural selection as the mechanism for evolutionary change.
Sociologists and scientists reject the idea of biological races because there is no scientific basis for race as a biological construct. Genetic variation between individuals is continuous and does not align neatly with traditional racial categories. Additionally, race is a social concept with a history of being used to justify discrimination and inequality.
Early man scholars rejected fossils as a means to trace human evolution because they held religious or cultural beliefs that contradicted the idea of human evolution. Additionally, fossils were not well understood or widely accepted as evidence of human ancestry at the time.
The theory of evolution was proposed by Charles Darwin in his book "On the Origin of Species" published in 1859. However, the idea of evolution had been discussed by earlier naturalists and scientists before Darwin.
These scientists shared the idea that organisms change over time through the process of evolution. They believed that organisms are adapted to their environment through natural selection, a mechanism proposed by Charles Darwin.
Well scientists believe that we evolved from the Apes, think of the era of the cave men that might give you some idea of what i mean.
Copernicus did not reject the idea that planetary orbits around our Sun were circular.
Early scientists before Darwin contributed to the study of evolution by proposing ideas that laid the foundation for evolutionary theory. For example, Lamarck proposed the idea of inheritance of acquired traits, while Cuvier demonstrated the concept of extinction. These contributions helped shape the understanding of evolution prior to Darwin's theory of natural selection.
Scientists have fossil evidence supporting the idea that life originated from simple, single-celled organisms that emerged over 3.5 billion years ago. Fossils of these early microorganisms, such as cyanobacteria, provide insights into the evolution of life on Earth.
Catholics did not reject the idea of infant baptism. Catholics have been baptizing eight-day old infants for a very long time.
Theistic evolution is the idea that God intervenes to guide the course of evolution. Naturalistic evolution makes no mention of God. Naturalistic evolution is the idea that evolution is a normal result of natural processeses. Naturalistic evolution is compatible with both atheism, and compatible with the idea of a God that can set in motion self-sufficient processes that work without any need for ongoing intervention.
Because they thought it was not good enough
Relativism or Relativity