The idea to consider human nature and nature itself as separate entity is a philosophical question. Some philosophers have argued that human nature is nature in itself. If divided, then they do not oppose each other because they are one nature.
Men share more genetic similarities with other human males than with non-human males, regardless of species. This is due to the common evolutionary history and shared genetic code among human males. Gender differences are more influenced by sex chromosomes (X and Y) rather than by differences between species.
There is no universally agreed upon hierarchy of animal life. Each species has unique adaptations and contributions to their ecosystems that make them equally valuable in their own right. All animals play important roles in maintaining the balance of their respective habitats.
Yes. The human bite s full of bacteria and other germs. Bye!
No, human lice do not communicate with each other in a manner that involves language or complex social interactions. They are simply parasitic insects that feed on human blood and reproduce.
Human can use bees to pollinate crops and there garden.
The idea to consider human nature and nature itself as separate entity is a philosophical question. Some philosophers have argued that human nature is nature in itself. If divided, then they do not oppose each other because they are one nature.
Nature v/s Nurture....This is a long discussion about what defines a human being: How much of what you are is determined by your genes (nature), and how much is determined by the environment in which you grow (nurture)?In other words "innate qualities" v/s "personal experience".Nowadays almost everyone agrees that it has to be a mixture of both. But where one ends and the other starts is still discussion material.Example question: Is criminal behaviour a result of nature or nurture?
Research suggests that both nature and nurture play significant roles in shaping human traits and behaviors. The interaction between genetics and environment is complex and interdependent, with both factors influencing each other. Ultimately, the nature-nurture debate often emphasizes the importance of recognizing the combined impact of genetic predispositions and environmental influences on individual development.
The "nature vs. nurture" debate suggests that either genetics ("nature") or the environment ("nurture'') played a major role in producing particular behaviors, personality traits, psychological disorders, or pretty much any other thing that a human does. The emerging picture from current research is that both nurture and nature play a role in directing behavior, and the focus has shifted to examining the relative contributions of each influence rather than the absolute contributions of either influence alone. In short, it's the interaction of genes and environmental influences that determines what humans do.
...nurture. Otherwise known as a theory that suggests that we humans can change what is inherently in our "nature" by cultivating (nurturing) other behaviors.
AnswerNurture is the effect the people in your life had on you growing up. An example would be the values your parents taught you. Nature is the genetics you received, like eye color.
What is the interaction between genes and environment? Apex- (;
You got your green eyes from your mother, and your freckles from your father. But where did you get your thrill-seeking personality and talent for singing? Did you learn these from your parents or was it predetermined by your genes? While it's clear that physical characteristics are hereditary, the genetic waters get a bit more murky when it comes to an individual's behavior, intelligence, and personality. Ultimately, the old argument of nature vs. nurture has never really been won. We do not yet know how much of what we are is determined by our DNA and how much by our life experience. But we do know that both play a part.
It really depends in a situation where the biological parents are raising the children they influence both nature (by passing on their genes) and nurture (by raising them and instilling values. On the other hand if a child is born to biological parents and they are unable to care for the child, put that baby up for adoption the adopted parents would nurture and there would in essence be no nature involved in this scenario.
Nature. In the absence of having a disease that leads to hair loss, baldness is an inherited genetic trait - just as is hair color, eye color, and other physical traits.
Nature has to do with genetics, heredity, and human evolution. Some things are inherent in all humans and other things are inherited from other people in your family. These are the things you are born with, whereas nurture is that which you are taught after birth.
Absolutely. There is much debate as to how much each role plays in the outcome of a child's personality, but both are important to some degree. Much of nature is strictly genetics and cannot be changed no matter what because it is what you are born with. On the other hand nuturing a child, especially during the critical younger years of a child's life is extremely important.