Those two are the same.
Somewhat different was the position of Lincoln and the Republican Party when they won the 1860 election.
Along with most people in the North, they knew that slavery was the mainstay of the cotton industry, and they were keen not to lose the cotton revenues.
But they were also keen to maintain their majority in Congress, and be free to protect American industry (nearly all in the North) with import tariffs that the South were liable to pay, having no industry of their own.
The war started when the newly-inaugurated Lincoln (not an abolitionist) rejected the final compromise because it would have allowed for some new slave-states.
the fighting between proslavery and antislavery groups in Kansasthe violent clashes between pro slavery and antislavery groups in the Kansas territory.
1.economic and social differences between the north and south 2. states rights vs. federal rights 3.fight between pro-slavery and abolition 4.growth of the abolition movement 5.the election of 1980-Abraham Lincoln
Fighting between proslavery and antislavery activists in Kansas
The goal of the American Colonization Society was to relocate slaves and free Blacks to Africa, specifically, modern Liberia. Garrison's organization's goal was immediate abolition of slavery.
Five reasons for the Civil War:Social and economic differences between the North and SouthStates' rights versus federal rightsThe fight between slave state proponents and non-slave state proponentsGrowth of the Abolition movementThe election of Abraham Lincoln as presidentTo preserve the Union.
The election of Lincoln to the presidency was considered to be both pro-slavery and antislavery. However, he was predominantly supported by antislavery forces because he fought for abolition.
African
Antislavery movement, nat turner, Frederick douglass, William garrison
the fighting between proslavery and antislavery groups in Kansasthe violent clashes between pro slavery and antislavery groups in the Kansas territory.
1.economic and social differences between the north and south 2. states rights vs. federal rights 3.fight between pro-slavery and abolition 4.growth of the abolition movement 5.the election of 1980-Abraham Lincoln
Abolition of the slave trade was seen as a more achievable goal compared to immediate emancipation of existing slaves. By targeting the trade aspect, reformers could highlight the brutality and inhumanity of the practice, garnering more public support for the antislavery movement. Additionally, stopping the trade was a strategic move to weaken the institution of slavery overall.
Antislavery crusaders sought freedom and better treatment for slaves, working to end the institution of slavery and advocating for the abolition of laws that supported it. They also worked towards social and political equality for former slaves after emancipation.
1.economic and social differences between the north and south 2. states rights vs. federal rights 3.fight between pro-slavery and abolition 4.growth of the abolition movement 5.the election of 1980-Abraham Lincoln
Abolition refers to the act of ending or eliminating something, such as slavery. Anti-slavery, on the other hand, is the opposition or resistance to the practice of slavery. In essence, abolition is the action taken to bring about an end to slavery, while anti-slavery is the belief or stance against the institution of slavery.
the fighting between proslavery and antislavery groups in Kansasthe violent clashes between pro slavery and antislavery groups in the Kansas territory.
a violent clash beetween proslavery and antislavery forces.
Abolitionists used antislavery literature to raise awareness about the inhumane conditions of slavery, educate the public about the moral implications of owning slaves, and inspire empathy for enslaved individuals. This literature played a significant role in shaping public opinion, increasing support for abolition, and fueling the national debate over slavery. It helped to galvanize the movement and eventually led to the abolition of slavery in the United States.