Weaknesses are groups are treated as individuals.... it is assumed the individual is responding to the group they are associated with and not the researcher.
The circumstances of the experiment... it is held in a lab and not a natural environment..
Social processes are simplified and do not reflect processes in an every day context.
Ethical issues surrounding the Natural environment experiment or class room test with Elliot... eventhough it provides support to his theory
Hope it helps!
it seems like this question does not have an answer. Ok i am going but i Will be back to answer this question.
Labeling Theory
A few of the weaknesses could be that symbols may be interpretted wrong, it doesn't develop the idea of socialisation, it cannot adaquetly explain where people get the meanings to these symbols and that it ends up drawing these answers from other sociological theories, and it doesn't explain social order and how it comes about. The strengths of it would be that it takes into account individuals free will, the choices they make and how they behave. As it is a Micro theory it is more detailed and beneficial to individuals. It also gives real insight into small scale interactions, which we would not be able to define with a macro theory.
strength: realistic reflection of world weakness: assumes commitment to materialistic goals only focuses on lower class ignore spontaneous crime
what are the strength of malthusian theory of population
weaknesses: can not controll language, actions around certain people
what are the strengths and weakness of modernization theory
it seems like this question does not have an answer. Ok i am going but i Will be back to answer this question.
challenges of standard theory of linguistics
Strengths of the Social Control Theory 1) Explains the role of social influece from the media, peers and parents 2) Covers a wider range of explanations such as the importance of cognitive factors rather than suggesting we have no control Weaknesses of the Social Control Theory 1)Reductionist- could be other factors affecting behaviour such as genetics 2) Its questionable whether vicarious reinforcements are consistent enough to change behaviour
The weaknesses are that assessing outcomes is difficult, decision making process is not rational and difficulty when small tasks need to be identified. The strengths are that the group can accomplish the final goal and focuses on group identity.
There are many strengths and weaknesses of Social Learning Theory. Some strengths include:Accounts and allows for cognitive processesUses both experimental and non-experimental dataDoes explain a large number of behavioursSome weakness include:Doesn't explain all behaviour - how can someone still act in a way they've seen being punished?Doesn't explain differences. People brought up together act very differently.Relies on subjective perceptions. What one person might see as punishment another might see as reward.
it was developed by Herni Tajfel
weaknesses power efficiency who gains? rational choice theory rent-seeking behavior examples failure in Latin America; India; japan in 1990
This would depend on which theory you are going off of. Each of the theories have merits and demerits to why they would be the best.
Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences
A few of the weaknesses could be that symbols may be interpretted wrong, it doesn't develop the idea of socialisation, it cannot adaquetly explain where people get the meanings to these symbols and that it ends up drawing these answers from other sociological theories, and it doesn't explain social order and how it comes about. The strengths of it would be that it takes into account individuals free will, the choices they make and how they behave. As it is a Micro theory it is more detailed and beneficial to individuals. It also gives real insight into small scale interactions, which we would not be able to define with a macro theory.