It suggested that powerful countries had the right to rule over weaker countries.
The Social Darwinism ideology was very popular in the late nineteenth century in justifying Imperialism. By extending the idea of "the survival of the fittest" presented in Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species to the social interactions between humans, some Americans believed that they (the superior race) were well justified to exploit lesser races to advance and benefit themselves.
Social Darwinism argues that each nation and people rises and falls as their culture proves its inherent worth or lack thereof. This is proven and demonstrated by the cultural, political, and military expansion of the dominant societies and weakening and elimination of weaker societies. As a result, as Europe was ascendant, it had the right propagate its culture and remove inadequate cultures. Only the fittest societies should survive and it was deemed natural for superior nations to economically and politically dominate less-advanced nations. This policy of dominating less-advanced nations is imperialism.
It provided a justification for colonizing "lesser" people
Social Darwinism is a idea that is similar to survival of the fittest. They used this idea to and divide preexisting areas or territories.
Justify monopolistic actions
Social Darwinism justified imperialism. Post-Enlightenment, people started turning to science to answer life's questions and not religion. This new science of social Darwinism purported a hierarchy of beings. This, therefore, allowed imperialists nations to justify their exploitation and presence in other countries of 'inferior' peoples.
it justified that Whites should rule over other "weaker" races to help better the world.
Social Darwinism held that those made better or worse by industrialization were based on the natural predisposition of the people effected. For those who were made better off, the success of those people demonstrated that they had a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures, which were those "chosen" by the fact that they were performing poorly.All in all, according to the Social Darwinist, Imperialism was the natural expansion and success of a well-evolved culture and this expansion would help remove or improve underperforming cultures.
european Imperialism in the late 19th century
It suggested that powerful countries had the right to rule over weaker countries.
It suggested that powerful countries had the right to rule over weaker countries.
Social Darwinism is a idea that is similar to survival of the fittest. They used this idea to and divide preexisting areas or territories.
Social Darwinism is a idea that is similar to survival of the fittest. They used this idea to and divide preexisting areas or territories.
Europeans believed they should conquer other lands to help those places become industrialized.
The europeans used Social Darwinism to justify their increase in emprie building with the justification that all creatures have and will still continue to evolve, and as such, there needed to be new accomodations met.
Social Darwinism is a idea that is similar to survival of the fittest. They used this idea to and divide preexisting areas or territories.
Justify monopolistic actions
it provided a justifacation for colonzing lesser people
Social Darwinism justified imperialism. Post-Enlightenment, people started turning to science to answer life's questions and not religion. This new science of social Darwinism purported a hierarchy of beings. This, therefore, allowed imperialists nations to justify their exploitation and presence in other countries of 'inferior' peoples.
it justified that Whites should rule over other "weaker" races to help better the world.