Maybe you mean the letter to the Colossians. Colossians is a book in the New Testament of The Bible it is a letter written by Paul to the church at Colosse. It was probably written while Paul was imprisoned in Rome around AD60.
The purpose of the letter was to combat false teaching in the church at Colosse and to show that believers have everything they need in Christ.
Paul had never been to Colosse the church was established by Epaphras.
When Paul wrote his letter he had never seen the church at Colossi. It is believed that the church was established by Epaphras - Col 1:7.
Paul writes to teach against errors introduced by Gnosticism. The book can be broadly divided:
Chapters 1, 2 -- The preeminence of Christ.
Chapters 3,4 -- The believers duty to the preeminence of Christ
His name is epaphras many believe that it was Paul but not so. Colossians 1:7
Paul did not start the church in Colossae. According to his epistle to the Colossians (chapter 1, verse 7) Paul states that the Colossians learned about Christ through Epaphras, "fellow slave" of Christ.
colossians
No, Luke was not a slave in the Bible. He was a physician and companion of the apostle Paul, who wrote the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles in the New Testament.
All of the apostles, as a group (Acts 5), Peter(Acts 12), Paul and Silas (Acts 16), Paul (Acts 22), Aristarchus (Colossians 4).
The biblebook Colossians has 4 chapters
All of them. Luke uses the phrase the most; John the least. "Kingdom of God" also appears in Acts, Romans, 1 Corinthians, Galatians, Colossians and 2 Thessalonians.
According to Colossians 4:14 ("Luke, the beloved physician, and Demas, greet you."), Luke the companion of Paul was a physician. This information should be treated with caution, as a majority of critical scholars believe that Colossians was not really written by Paul, but was written pseudepigraphically in the 70s of the first century - probably by someone who had never met Luke.According to a tradition originating later in the second century, the gospel now known as Luke's Gospel was written by Luke, as was Acts of the Apostles, according to the same tradition. However, the books were originally anonymous and were probably not written by Luke.In summary: Luke's Gospel and Acts of the Apostles were probably not really written by Luke, but even if they were, Luke may not have been a physician. However, these are the two books intended by the question.
Vincent M. Smiles has written: 'The Gospel and the law in Galatia' -- subject(s): Bible, Biblical teaching, Law and gospel, Theology 'The Bible and science' -- subject(s): Religion and science, Bible and science 'First Thessalonians, Philippians, Second Thessalonians, Colossians, Ephesians' -- subject(s): Bible, Commentaries
Traditionally, Luke is believed to be a physician based on Colossians 4:14 where Paul refers to him as "the beloved physician." However, this identification is not explicitly confirmed in the New Testament.
In the King James version the word - gospel - appears in the following books Matthew Mark Luke Acts Romans 1 Corinthians 2 Corinthians Galatians Ephesians Philippians Colossians 1 Thessalonians 2 Thessalonians Philemon Hebrews 1 Peter Revelations
I don't know who Lee is but the New Testament was written by various people. Matthew wrote the Gospel of Matthew Mark -- the Gospel of Mark Luke -- the Gospel of Luke, Acts Paul -- Romans, 1and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1and 2 Thessalonians, 1and 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon John -- the Gospel of John, 1John, 2John, 3John, Revelation James -- book of James Jude -- book of Jude Peter -- 1 and 2 Peter The author of the letter to the Hebrews is unknown.