0
Another answer from our community:One of the commonly used arguments against the historicity of Jesus is that details of His life and teachings and death etc were not mentioned in some of the original Christian writings in terms of the dates when they were written.
Yet Paul, writing in 1 Corinthians, dated in around 56 or 57 AD records an early Christian creed, which dates from the earliest days of the Christian faith. This creed records a number of simple and central historical details which were allegedly unknown until the Gospels began to be written later. This simple creed demonstrates that the idea that these key historical events were unknown is inaccurate. It also shown that both the key events, as well as the key witnesses were important, and also that the factual and historical nature of the resurrection was central to early Christian confession.
Some of the evidence against the historicity of Jesus is circumstantial. For example, no first century epistle, even when discussing Christian baptism, ever mentioned the baptism of Jesus, or even John the Baptist. Moreover, neither Paul nor any other first century Christian author expressed any desire to see the birthplace of Jesus, visit Nazareth, or Calvary where Jesus was supposed to have died to save humanity, or to see the tomb where he was buried and rose from the dead. It was as if they knew only a spiritual Jesus, not a historical Jesus. Until Mark's Gospel, written decades later, there is a silence that suggests that mid-first century Christians did not know of the momentous events in the life of Jesus of Nazareth.
What we do find, is evidence that the earliest Christian writers saw Jesus as spiritual, not as a real person who had lived on earth in the recent past:
- Speaking of Jesus, Hebrews 8:4 says, "For if he were on earth, he should not be a priest ...", virtually saying that he had never been on earth.
- 1 Corinthians 2:7-8, "But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: which none of the princes of this world knew; for had they known it they would not have crucified the Lord of glory." In this, Paul can not have been calling the Jewish priests "princes of this world" or saying that they did not know the wisdom of God. But the term "princes of this world" is a term that was widely used to refer to the demonic forces which were believed to inhabit the lower heavens. Here, Paul seems to be saying that Jesus was crucified in the spiritual world - evidence that Paul did not know of Jesus as a historical person. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15, seems to see no difference between the appearances of the risen Jesus to Cephas and the others, and his visionary appearance to Paul himself. In other words, all these appearances were purely spiritual, with no human dimension.
So, those who argue against the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth say that he was a literary invention of the author of Mark's Gospel.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What has the author Helen K Bond written?
Helen K. Bond has written: 'The historical Jesus' -- subject(s): Historicity 'The historical Jesus' -- subject(s): Historicity
What evidence exists outside the Bible that Jesus was a real historical figure?
There are texts from some non-Christian historians (and others), such as Josephus and Tacitus. For more details, check the Wikipedia article entitled "Historicity of Jesus". ---------- There is no contemporary evidence that Jesus was a real, historical person. Later authors, such as Josephus and Tacitus described the Christians who worshipped Jesus, but make no attempt to vouch for his historicity.
What are two reasons to agree with Jesus' resurrection?
A:As a Christian you would agree with the historicity of Jesus' resurrection i) because it is a central teaching of Christianity, and ii) because not to do so would begin to call into doubt the reliabilty of the gospel records. As a non-Christian you would not need to agree with the historicity of Jesus' resurrection for either of these reasons.
What has the author Gregory W Dawes written?
Gregory W. Dawes has written: 'The Historical Jesus Quest' 'The historical Jesus question' -- subject(s): History of doctrines, Historicity 'The body in question' -- subject(s): Criticism, interpretation, Bible 'A new science of religion' -- subject(s): Religion 'The Historical Jesus Question' -- subject(s): History of doctrines, Historicity
What are the major arguments against planning?
There are no real, good arguments against planning. Having a plan is important in many cases.
Arguments against economic integration world leader command?
Arguments against economic integration world leader command?
What are Arguments for against of voluntary work?
are you for or against voluntary work
What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
What has the author Mike Licona written?
Mike Licona has written: 'The resurrection of Jesus' -- subject(s): Resurrection, History of doctrines, Historicity
What are the arguments for and against celibacy?
Celibacy is abstinence from sex or sexual relations. There are arguments for it to protect people from unwanted pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases and religious purity. There are arguments against it saying that it is restrictive and that it goes against following the laws of nature.
How do you use the word countervail in a sentence?
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
What were the arguments against declaring independence?
The arguments against declaring independence were that the declaration of independance would lead to war and the colonist would not be faithful
