Socrates believed humans can live honest lives and honor and integrity is more important than wealth, fame and other attributes. This is similar to the Buddhist and Hindu beliefs, Buddhist thought people should live a moderate lifestyle and reduce desires of material things and worldly attraction. The Hindu faith also believed that people should not strive for material reward or recognition, in contrast to all three Zoroastrianism considered the material world that reflected blessings of Ahura Mazda. Both Zoroastrianism and Hindu did not call for simple life as Socrates and Buddhist; but both Buddhist and Socrates felt it was necessary to have thoughtful reflection on an individual's life. They all had their moral beliefs because they believed in life after death but it wasn't really the case for Socrates, he humans are obligated to strive for moral and personal integrity he also believed death could either have another phase or it was a long never ending sleep. -Amu-wright, Wilson.
The 3 words will be 'Morality', 'Meditation' and 'Wisdom'. The ultimate motivation of a Buddhist is to attain enlightenment; the complete understanding of the true nature of existence. To do that he/she has to journey inward into the higher level of consiousness by 'Meditation' and to reduce or avoid distracting thoughts that hinders the progress of meditation he/she has to purify the mind by doing good and avoiding evil (Morality).
very important
The 3 forms of practice of a Buddhist are Morality, Meditation and the Middle way, the 3 'M's. Morality deals with the purification of mind, body and speech. Meditation deals with the spiritual journey 'inward' to realise the true nature of things. Morality and Meditation are the vechicles to the Middle way, the enlightened state of mind, which is beyond the physical and mental aspects of any living being.
Slave morality and master morality are two contrasting ethical systems proposed by philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. Slave morality is characterized by values such as humility, compassion, and meekness, which are typically associated with the oppressed or disadvantaged. In contrast, master morality is based on values like strength, power, and dominance, often embraced by those in positions of authority or privilege. The key distinction lies in the source of moral values and the perspective from which they are viewed.
The theory of good is a philosophical concept that seeks to define what is considered morally right or virtuous. It impacts our understanding of ethics and morality by providing a framework for evaluating actions and behaviors based on their perceived goodness or value. This theory helps guide individuals in making ethical decisions and understanding the principles that underlie moral behavior.
Master morality and slave morality are two contrasting ethical systems proposed by Friedrich Nietzsche. Master morality is based on values such as strength, power, and nobility, where individuals define good and evil based on their own terms. In contrast, slave morality is rooted in values like humility, compassion, and meekness, where good and evil are determined by the oppressed or weak in response to the actions of the powerful. The key difference lies in the source of moral values and the perspective from which they are defined.
The concept of an all-powerful, all-good, and all-knowing being can raise questions about why there is suffering in the world if such a being exists. It challenges our understanding of morality by questioning how a benevolent being could allow suffering to exist.
Heteronomous morality is when a person follows rules or moral principles set by an external authority, such as parents or society, without questioning or understanding the reasons behind them. An example of this could be a teenager obeying a curfew set by their parents without understanding the importance of safety or respecting their parents' wishes.
In a very small way, reason and emotion do have a play in justifying moral decisions. But the main factor is our conditioning from our society, religion, ethnicity, regionalism, politics, etc. A Buddhist will act based on Buddhist's morality, a Christian, Muslim Jewish, etc., based on their own morality. However, what happens if our conditioning is in conflict with our reasons. Which would we follow in making a moral decision?
The philosophy of good is the belief that certain actions or qualities are inherently good or right. It shapes our understanding of morality and ethics by providing a framework for determining what is considered morally right or wrong. This philosophy helps guide our decisions and behavior by emphasizing the importance of doing what is morally good and virtuous.
Divine law refers to moral and ethical principles believed to be dictated by a higher power or deity. It impacts our understanding of morality and ethics by providing a foundation for right and wrong based on religious teachings. This can influence individuals' behavior and decision-making, shaping their sense of right and wrong.
Define and contrast the three ethical perspectives. Relativism,Emotivism,Ethical Egoism:How do the perspectives differ from the ethical theories? What does each ethical perspective tell us about morality and virtue?