0
Divine command ethics vs reason-based deontological ethics vs vitual ethics vs ethical relativism?
Assuming you are asking what the difference between the three, Divine command ethics is the idea that all ethics are handed down from a supreme being to humans. This set of ethics includes everything that is right/wrong in the particular religion of the person in question.
Reason-based deontological ethics are ethics based on obligations, such as the obligation to pay your taxes, to tell the truth, etc. Most ethics based on this system are derived from what benefits the society and the ideals of the society in question, leaving some of what is covered by divine command ethics up to the individuals opinion.
An example of the differences between the two would be that in divine command ethics based off of Christianity, homosexuality is strictly wrong. In reason-based ethics, using the definition of society as simply a group of people, homosexuality is a question left to the person's opinions as it does not violate any obligations a person may have. Another example would be the question of divorce. In divine command ethics based off of Christianity, divorce is wrong. In Reason based ethics, as the act of divorce, if not the associated ordeals, harms no person, it does not violate any obligations a person may have, assuming that the society has a method in place for divorce.
Ethical Relativism isn't so much a system of ethics as the idea that ethics change depending on the situation. Using this as an argument, one can claim that an act such as killing another person is not unethical if they are from a faction (country, tribe, religion, etc) that is at war with them. Ethical relativism is also applied in the idea of self-defense, as it is considered fine to harm a person if their actions jeopardize the safety of others. An extreme example of this would be the claim that stealing is no longer unethical if it is the only way for a person to survive.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which is proper approach of ethics ethical relativism and cultural relativism?
In ethics one must approach the situation from the ethical relativism point of view. Ethical relativism places the decision between right or wrong with the group of people affected.
What is the difference between act utilitarianism and ethical relativism?
what is the fundamental difference between act utilitarianism and ethical relativism? is a good and bad discussion about the true of life
A person utilizing the deontological ethical theory to make decisions makes the correct moral choice based on?
a person utilizing the deontological ethical theory to make decisions makes the correct moral choice based on?
A deontological ethical theory is one that emphasizes?
In philosophy, deontological ethical theory explains the relationship between duty and the morality of human actions. Deontology is a Greek word that focuses on logic and ethics.
What is individual ethical relativism?
Individual ethical relativism is the belief that each person sets their own moral standards based on their own personal beliefs, experiences, and circumstances. This means that what is considered right or wrong can vary from person to person, depending on their individual perspective.
What does deontological and teleological ethical system have in common?
Deontological and teleological ethical systems both aim to provide guidance on moral behavior. However, they differ in their focus: deontological ethics emphasizes duty and following rules and principles regardless of the outcome, while teleological ethics focuses on the consequences or outcomes of actions to determine their morality.
Is Ethical formalism teleological or Deontological?
Ethical formalism falls under deontological ethics, which focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions rather than their consequences. It emphasizes following moral duties and principles, such as universal rules of conduct, regardless of the outcomes.
What is the link between ethical relativism and religion?
spirituality and peace of mind.
Is Natural Law deontological or teleological?
Natural Law is a deontological ethical theory, as it focuses on the moral duty to follow principles that are inherently good and universal, rather than on the consequences of actions (teleological approach).
How do you define and contrast relativism?
Relativism is the belief that truth and morality are not absolute, but are instead based on individual perspectives or cultural beliefs. In contrast, objectivism posits that there are objective truths and moral standards that are true regardless of personal or cultural viewpoints. Relativism allows for diverse beliefs and practices, while objectivism seeks to identify universal truths.
What are the types of ethical judgment and ethical reasoning?
There are different types of ethical judgments and ethical reasoning's that are based on beliefs/ Egoism, justice, deontology, and relativism are different points of view.
What is the difference between moral relativism and ethical relativism?
Ethical relativism denies universal moral principles, claiming that moral codes are strictly subjective. Ethical situationalism states moral principles are objective, and should be applied differently in different contexts.
