answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The truth of God's Word in Romans explains that all humans have a conscience and desire self and group acceptance.

Romans 2:13-15 "(For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)"

Further truth reveals that all humans are also subject to deceitful lusts.

Ephesians 4:22 "That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts;"

Before God's involvement in our lives, we were “dead in trespasses and sins” and “by nature the children of wrath” due to Satan's influence.

Ephesians 2:1,2 “And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air…”

By accepting Christ, a person receives the spirit of God within and can accomplish good works for God.

Ephesians 2:10 "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them."

Only when love is the motivator can a person renew his mind and replace the old man nature with the new man.

Colossians 3:9,10 "Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds; And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:"

User Avatar

PsalmEquipt

Lvl 10
3mo ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Kristen Bingel

Lvl 1
1mo ago
There's no room for religion in psychology.. psychology is faith based with means it has no fact-based evidence. Psychology is science-based having been studied and correlated with physical or fact-based evidence.
User Avatar

PsalmEquipt

Lvl 1
1mo ago
You offer a valid distinction. Psychology utilizes observation, research, and analysis, whereas the Bible provides insights from the perspective of an all-knowing creator.
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

The debate on whether human nature is inherently good or evil remains ongoing. Some argue that humans possess both good and evil tendencies, influenced by various factors such as upbringing and environment. Ultimately, it is a complex and nuanced topic with no definitive answer.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Kristen Bingel

Lvl 2
1mo ago

ThThey are both. To everything there is must be a balance, a yin and yang, night and day, happy and sad, malice and kindness... We can be more of one than the other but even criminals can be kind- Robin Hood for example. God is seen as good but he was known to smite those who angered him... And destroyed entire cities. Nature- hurricanes, poisonous plants, venomous snakes... Of course clear sunny days, butterflies, delicious food... Man is part of nature therefore is capable of both good and evil: Hitler or Mother Teresa... So asking this question makes no sense...

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Actually neither. Good and evil aee subjective terms, dependent upon the perceiver. Human behavior is naturally inquisitive and egocentric. How that is viewed by others is judged good or evil. There are many philosophers on both sides of this question - suggest reading the Lockean v Hobbsian Consensus.

Another answer:

Human nature is "selfish and rebellious to authority." Therefore, it's naturally drawn to "evil and sin." It's easily deceived... either by the god of this world, or even self-deception.

"...the carnal mind [the natural mind of man] is enmity [hostile] to God: for it is not subject to the Law of God, neither indeed can be." (Rom.8:7 KJV)

So, the answer is: human nature is inherently EVIL... but likes to THINK its good.

Additional Answer:

From the biblical account of creation the first human beings originally displayed no evil thoughts or actions. Adam & Eve lived in harmony with their Creator and with each other. As God saw, all was 'good.'

We are also told in The Bible that human beings were made in the image and likeness of God. This is why we have the ability to love, to reason and to feel and express complex emotions.

Along with reasoning, God gave each of us the capacity to look at facts and come to conclusions - hence the power to choose. We make hundreds of reasoned choices each day from what to wear and decide what we'll have for lunch. We determine what in our lives gets priority. We also choose which thoughts we'll consider and which ones we'll discard - how we'll deal with our emotions and what actions we'll take in treating others.

It is in this way that we human beings have the capacity to choose between good and evil. We can choose to control our anger or we can choose to burn down our neighbor's house in revenge. The issue of choice is a complex human activity, but freedom of choice explains why human beings can be both good and evil.

Although unpopular today, the being Satan (who rejected God and became the opposite of Him) enters the Garden and tempts Eve with the forbidden fruit (see Gensis 3:6). She did eat and then offered it to Adam who deliberately disobeyed God by also eatingof it and they both,immediately started to experience the world on Satan's level (opposite of God: hate, angry, selfish, cruel, inwardly pleasing, etc). So it began...

Their human nature became a mixture of good and evil. The evil in them, and in all of us, is a reflection of the devil's evil nature and is the opposite of what God intended for us.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

It was the fourth-century saint, Augustine who really introduced the idea that man is inherently evil to the Western Church. The Orthodox Churches never accepted this Augustine doctrine and do not hold that man is inherently evil.

So it is a Christian view, held in parts of the Western Church, that man is inherently evil. The rest of us see good in man and only regard a person as evil if he demonstrates himself to be so.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

The Scripture is very clear that mankind has the knowledge of both good and evil and has the free will to choose between them. Philosophers like Locke and Hobbes take the two different approaches to this question as with the natural law approach of Saint Thomas Aquinas.

In God's creation, everything was good. By deception Eve ate of the forbidden fruit God had warned them not to eat from. She gave it to her husband Adam who ate of it too. Thus the first sin. From then on humankind had choices to make - follow the way of God which is good or of the way of the 'god' of this world - ha Satan, which is evil.

2 Corinthians 4:3-4New King James Version (NKJV)3 But even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, 4 whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Another answer from our community:

Human nature is inherently evil and self-deceiving... and likes to THINK it's good.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is human nature inherently good or evil?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Psychology

Is propaganda evil?

Propaganda itself is not inherently evil, as it can be used to promote positive messages and ideas. However, it can become harmful when it is used to spread misinformation, manipulate opinions, or incite hatred and violence. It is important to critically evaluate the source and content of any information to counter the negative effects of propaganda.


If somebody who is honorable does something that is evil do you view that person as still good or now evil?

It depends on the context. A single act of evil does not necessarily define a person as evil overall. Honorable individuals may make mistakes or act out of character at times. It's important to consider the person's overall behavior and intentions before passing judgment.


What approach to personality assumes that human nature is basically good?

Humanistic approach to personality assumes that human nature is basically good, emphasizing people’s innate drive towards self-actualization and personal growth. This perspective focuses on individuals' capacity for positive growth and development, highlighting their potential for fulfillment and realization of their true self.


How did evil get into the world?

Once sentience is achieved human kind has always sought after more than their meager existence allowed, greed for material wealth and by extension power. Evil is in this world because some men forsake their humanity and become monsters, all for the sake of wealth and power. There are also lesser evils, like murderers and thieves, these people often have mental illnesses, were abused as a child or had some sort of traumatic experience, either that or they were simply born in an environment that promotes evil. Evil births evil, as does good births good.


What theory does the humanistic perspective advance?

The humanistic perspective in psychology advances the theory that individuals are inherently good, with a focus on personal growth, self-actualization, and fulfilling one's potential. It emphasizes the importance of free will, self-awareness, and personal choice in shaping human behavior.

Related questions

What is the nature of human being is it good or evil?

The nature of human beings is complex and can vary from person to person. Some may argue that humans have the capacity for both good and evil, while others may believe that humans are inherently good but influenced by external factors. Ultimately, it is difficult to categorize all human beings as purely good or evil as individuals are capable of both positive and negative actions.


Is man's evil nature is constant until he is redeemed?

Views on human nature vary, but some believe that people are inherently capable of both good and evil actions. Redemption or personal growth can lead individuals to make better choices, but the potential for both good and evil remains. It's important to recognize the complexity and individuality of human behavior.


Is animal by nature good or evil?

Good and evil are human concepts. Animals simply are.


Are humans beings are intrinsically good or intrinsically evil?

The nature of human beings is a complex topic and can vary among individuals. Some argue that humans are inherently good, while others believe that humans can exhibit both good and evil behaviors. Ultimately, it is a matter of perspective and context.


How do revolutionaries view man as inherently good or evil?

Revolutionaries may view man as inherently good, believing that people have the capacity for compassion, creativity, and cooperation to bring about positive change. However, some revolutionaries may also see man as inherently flawed or capable of evil, which can drive the need for radical upheaval and change in society. Ultimately, perspectives on human nature can vary among revolutionaries based on their ideological beliefs and experiences.


Is good and evil a part of human nature?

The concept of good and evil is subjective and varies among different cultures and individuals. Some argue that humans have an inherent sense of morality, while others believe that good and evil are learned behaviors influenced by society and environment. Ultimately, the presence of good and evil in human nature is a complex topic with no definitive answer.


What are beliefs on human nature?

Beliefs on human nature vary depending on cultural, religious, and philosophical perspectives. Some believe humans are inherently good, while others see human nature as being a balance of good and bad traits. Some hold the view that humans are inherently selfish or competitive, while others believe in our capacity for empathy and cooperation.


How did the daoists and legalists view the idea of human nature (instincts)?

Daoists believed that human nature was inherently good and aligned with the Tao, advocating for living in harmony with nature and cultivating spontaneous action. Legalists, on the other hand, believed that human nature was inherently selfish and needed to be controlled through strict laws and harsh punishments to maintain order in society.


Was the mist evil in Mistborn?

The mists in Mistborn are not inherently evil; instead, they are described as mysterious and powerful. They play a significant role in the story, but their nature is more complex than simply being good or evil.


Did john Locke believe people were good or evil?

John Locke believed that people were born as a blank slate, or tabula rasa, and that their character was shaped by their experiences and environment. He did not believe that people were inherently good or evil, but rather that they had the capacity to act in ways that aligned with reason and natural law.


Do puritans view man as good or evil or somewhere in between?

do puritans view man as inherently good evil or somewhere in between ?


Why would a person not antecedently convinced of the existence of a supreme being not infer the goodness of such a creature upon examining the facts about nature?

because that person would be looking for proof of a god that they inherently believe to be good in a world full of misery, hate and evil. specifically in nature there are typhoons, hurricanes, disease all of which occur in nature and kill creatures without regard to whether they are "good or evil" in respect to what their supreme good being considers to be "good or evil".