The truth of God's Word in Romans explains that all humans have a conscience and desire self and group acceptance.
Romans 2:13-15 "(For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)"
Further truth reveals that all humans are also subject to deceitful lusts.
Ephesians 4:22 "That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts;"
Before God's involvement in our lives, we were “dead in trespasses and sins” and “by nature the children of wrath” due to Satan's influence.
Ephesians 2:1,2 “And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air…”
By accepting Christ, a person receives the spirit of God within and can accomplish good works for God.
Ephesians 2:10 "For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them."
Only when love is the motivator can a person renew his mind and replace the old man nature with the new man.
Colossians 3:9,10 "Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds; And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:"
well, everyone does evil in their lifetime--it's in our nature. A person can be a good person because you trust them, they are virtuous, haven't gone to jail, you know, just a good dude. But that good dude can mess up, he can get really angry, and do something he'll regret later. A big difference between good and evil people is that good people have a conscience, and regret the bad things they did. Evil people do bad things to others because they enjoy it, and don't regret it later.
Propaganda itself is not inherently evil, as it can be used to promote positive messages and ideas. However, it can become harmful when it is used to spread misinformation, manipulate opinions, or incite hatred and violence. It is important to critically evaluate the source and content of any information to counter the negative effects of propaganda.
The humanistic movement in psychology is oriented toward the positive nature of human beings. This includes Client centered, Gestalt and Existential theory. Individual Theory, part of the psychodynamic movement in psychology, also centers around the positive nature of human beings.
Once sentience is achieved human kind has always sought after more than their meager existence allowed, greed for material wealth and by extension power. Evil is in this world because some men forsake their humanity and become monsters, all for the sake of wealth and power. There are also lesser evils, like murderers and thieves, these people often have mental illnesses, were abused as a child or had some sort of traumatic experience, either that or they were simply born in an environment that promotes evil. Evil births evil, as does good births good.
According to Émile Durkheim, duality of Human Nature is the opposition of the two following concepts: Soul VS. Body. (From a religious point of view) The Body is egoist and the Soul is Reasonable. These two concepts are in opposition and makes us the contradictory beings we are.This opposition gives us the need for spirituality in order to bind them. (Or at least make them coexist peacefully.)Durkheim call the duality of human nature: Homo Duplex.Answer #2: WAR.yin yangbad gooddark lightsad joy
Questions about human nature that have intrigued philosophers and scientists for centuries include: What is the essence of human nature? Are humans inherently good or evil? What drives human behavior? How do nature and nurture influence human development?
The nature of human beings is complex and can vary from person to person. Some may argue that humans have the capacity for both good and evil, while others may believe that humans are inherently good but influenced by external factors. Ultimately, it is difficult to categorize all human beings as purely good or evil as individuals are capable of both positive and negative actions.
Views on human nature vary, but some believe that people are inherently capable of both good and evil actions. Redemption or personal growth can lead individuals to make better choices, but the potential for both good and evil remains. It's important to recognize the complexity and individuality of human behavior.
Good and evil are human concepts. Animals simply are.
Revolutionaries may view man as inherently good, believing that people have the capacity for compassion, creativity, and cooperation to bring about positive change. However, some revolutionaries may also see man as inherently flawed or capable of evil, which can drive the need for radical upheaval and change in society. Ultimately, perspectives on human nature can vary among revolutionaries based on their ideological beliefs and experiences.
Beliefs on human nature vary depending on cultural, religious, and philosophical perspectives. Some believe humans are inherently good, while others see human nature as being a balance of good and bad traits. Some hold the view that humans are inherently selfish or competitive, while others believe in our capacity for empathy and cooperation.
Daoists believed that human nature was inherently good and aligned with the Tao, advocating for living in harmony with nature and cultivating spontaneous action. Legalists, on the other hand, believed that human nature was inherently selfish and needed to be controlled through strict laws and harsh punishments to maintain order in society.
The mists in Mistborn are not inherently evil; instead, they are described as mysterious and powerful. They play a significant role in the story, but their nature is more complex than simply being good or evil.
John Locke believed that people were born as a blank slate, or tabula rasa, and that their character was shaped by their experiences and environment. He did not believe that people were inherently good or evil, but rather that they had the capacity to act in ways that aligned with reason and natural law.
because that person would be looking for proof of a god that they inherently believe to be good in a world full of misery, hate and evil. specifically in nature there are typhoons, hurricanes, disease all of which occur in nature and kill creatures without regard to whether they are "good or evil" in respect to what their supreme good being considers to be "good or evil".
do puritans view man as inherently good evil or somewhere in between ?
Robespierre believed that humans were inherently good but corrupted by society and its institutions. He saw virtue and moral purity as natural to humans and believed that society's injustices were responsible for the degeneration of human nature.