In the US the following are generalities only. There are exceptions on both sides:
Liberals believe that individuals are collectively responsible for the welfare of the entire community. Thus more programs to help the entire community means that higher taxes and bigger government is needed to oversee the programs.
Conservatives believe that individuals are responsible for themselves, and that the community benefits from the efforts of the individuals acting in their interests. Thus less governmental programs, less taxes, and less government is the goal.
The terms may have different meanings in different countries.
Conservatism is a political or theological orientation advocating the preservation of the best in society and opposing radical changes.
Socialism is a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
Socialism seeks to replace the structure of the present economy with an alternative economic system that is not based on the accumulation of capital, private ownership of the means of production, and orientation of the economy to produce private profits. It seeks to resolve social and economic issues, such as economic crises, over-accumulation of capital, social inequality, and degenerate consumerist culture by tackling the cause of these problems - the capitalist system - and to replace capitalism with an economic system that does not generate these specific issues in the first place.
Progerssivism and liberalism (in the United States) seeks to tackle these same problems by treating the symptoms rather than the cause of the problems. Instead of replacing the system of capital accumulation and private ownership, they seek to regulate the existing system in the hope of preventing or mitigating the negative effects of economic crisis on ordinary citizens; to reduce inequality through social welfare programs and governmental policies that might contradict the underlying economic system.
In short, socialism is an alternative system to capitalism. Progressivism/Liberalism is tinkering around with the existing system of capitalism in order to make it "work" in a more equitable way.
Many socialists who believed in the strategy of reformism joined or aided the broader progressive movement during the 19th century, out of a desire to provide immediate relief and practical solutions to existing social problems within capitalism. This was partially done to broaden the appeal of the socialist cause and to win support in progressives and workers alike.
Read more: What_is_the_difference_between_socialism_and_liberalism
That is a question that can't be answered simply. The terms "conservative" and "liberal" are pretty vague and thrown around loosely; to add, there is no set policies or ideology for either group. People who refer to themselves as conservatives or liberals may have different views on issues than others under the same label. However, I would say as a very broad stereotype that conservatives believe in gaining and maintaining personal and economic freedom, while liberals are focused more on the welfare of society as a whole.
Yes, socialism and progressivism share some ideological roots such as a focus on social welfare, equality, and government intervention in the economy. While socialism advocates for the collective ownership of resources, progressivism focuses more on reforming existing capitalist structures to achieve social justice and equality. Progressivism can be influenced by socialist ideas, but they are not the same ideology.
A symbiotic relationship is a relationship between 2 organisms. Socialism is a form of government.
Surplus value is the difference between the value that workers produce and what they are paid in wages.
• Populism arose in the late 19th century while progressivism arose in the beginning of the 20th century. • Populism came from the farmers and the poor sections of the society from down south while progressivism came from middle classes, who were fed up with the corruption of the rich and the appeasement of the poor by the government. • While progressivism focused on changing the political system itself, populism focused upon reforming the economic system.
Socialism is a classless stateless society based on production for use. Anarchism is about abolishing government. Some anarchists (such as Kropotkin) also wanted a Socialist society, but many others do not.
Socialism lead up to communism and Nationalism if when everyone joins together to better the country as a whole, not just parts.
Socialism identifies a class struggle between the one percent who own the world and the rest of the population, who have to work for wages. The solution is to abolish the wages system and establish a classless society. Modern-day populism has vague ideas about βthe peopleβ vs some elite, but has no real idea about doing away with this.
That's the difference between socialism and democratic socialism. Ever since Obama's election, the term "socialism" has been thrown around and used much too loosely, resulting in any kind of socialist policy to be labeled as socialism. Democratic socialism (even though Bernie is more of a social democrat) is a centrist idea with a small allowance of leftist policy, such as socialized health care and education. In short, democratic socialism is primarily capitalist with little snippets of socialist policy, and is entirely different from socialism.
communist
communist
My god, its communist!
communist