0
I have the feeling that your question may be part of a series of questions that were put to you. So there is a risk in giving an answer out of the context of your homework assignment. But generally speaking, the strongest argument in any historical debate will be the one where facts and assumed motives can be supported by contemporary factual and documentary evidence; the more, the better.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Lao
Coach
FranHistorians determine the superiority of arguments based on evidence, logical reasoning, and adherence to historical context. Arguments that are supported by primary sources, are coherent and well-reasoned, and accurately reflect the historical context are typically considered superior. It is also important to consider counterarguments and alternative perspectives in evaluating the strength of an argument.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How should historians determine which argument is superior if two arguments about an historical event contradict each other?
Historians should assess the evidence supporting each argument, consider the credibility of the sources, and evaluate the context in which the arguments were made. They may also look for consensus among other historians or seek additional evidence to support one argument over the other. Ultimately, the argument that is best supported by a preponderance of evidence and critical analysis is considered superior.
One should avoid including what in an analytical essay?
One should avoid including personal opinions, unsupported claims, and emotional language in an analytical essay. It should focus on presenting a clear argument supported by evidence and analysis.
What should sources be evaluated for?
Sources should be evaluated for credibility, reliability, accuracy, and relevance to ensure the information is trustworthy and appropriate for the intended purpose. Check the author's credentials, publication date, potential biases, and supporting evidence to determine the credibility of a source.
When building an outline how should a writer categorize each piece of evidenceAsk us anything?
When building an outline, a writer should categorize each piece of evidence based on its relevance to the main points or arguments. Each piece of evidence should support a specific point or idea in the outline, helping to reinforce the writer's thesis or central argument. It's important to organize evidence cohesively within the outline to ensure a logical flow and effective support for the writer's main ideas.
Why should explaining history be left to historians?
Historians are trained to critically analyze historical events, sources, and interpretations. They have the necessary skills to contextualize information, avoid biases, and present a balanced perspective. Leaving the explanation of history to historians helps ensure accuracy and depth in understanding the complexities of the past.
