0
What else can I help you with?
Why Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if?
Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if new evidence contradicts the existing theory, if the theory fails to explain new observations accurately, or if a more comprehensive theory emerges that better explains the phenomena in question. Scientific theories are constantly refined and updated based on rigorous testing and evidence.
How do scientist prove a theory?
Scientists prove a theory by conducting experiments, making observations, and collecting data that support the theoretical predictions. Consistent and reproducible results from these experiments provide evidence to support the theory. Additionally, peer review and scrutiny by other scientists help validate the theory.
Why don't scientists accept the steady state theory?
Scientists do not widely accept the steady state theory because it does not align with observed evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the Hubble expansion of the universe. These observations strongly support the Big Bang theory, which is the prevailing cosmological model.
If after extensive research the expected observations predicted by a theory fail to materialize then the theory .?
may need to be revised or even discarded altogether. It is important for scientific theories to be tested against empirical evidence, and if the evidence does not support the predictions of the theory, it calls into question the validity of the theory itself. Scientists may need to go back to the drawing board to develop a new theory that better explains the observations.
What happens when two groups of scientists disagree about which theory is correct?
When scientists disagree about which theory is correct, they may engage in debates, present evidence to support their positions, and conduct further research to gather more data. Ultimately, the scientific community typically relies on evidence-based reasoning and peer-reviewed evaluation to determine the most well-supported theory. Over time, consensus is often reached through continued experimentation and analysis.
What is the theory that all the scientists provided evidence for the cell theory?
For their own benefits.
Who were the two scientists that brought forth supporting evidence to wegener's theory?
me and your mom
When would scientists need to change a theory?
Scientists had made observations that did not fit exactly with Dalton's theory. Scientists changed the atomic theory to include this new knowledge. While the modern atomic theory is based on Dalton's theory, it is also very different.
Why were most scientists disagreeing with Alfred Wegeners continental drift theory?
There was no evidence to prove it
If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?
if new evidence doesn't support a scientific theory, scientists will either revise the theory to accommodate the new evidence or discard the theory altogether in favor of a more accurate explanation. This process is crucial for the progress of science as it ensures that theories are continuously tested and refined to reflect our understanding of the natural world.
Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?
Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.
Do you think it's wise for scientists not to accept a theory immediately even if the theory has a lot of evidence to support it?
Each scientists have there own opinion. Some accept theories and some have to have facts.
Why Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if?
Scientists are most likely to change a scientific theory if new evidence contradicts the existing theory, if the theory fails to explain new observations accurately, or if a more comprehensive theory emerges that better explains the phenomena in question. Scientific theories are constantly refined and updated based on rigorous testing and evidence.
Why did scientists reject wegener theory?
because he had no evidence that the plates had moved so nobody belevied him
What do you think scientists would do if they found evidence that did not support the Big Bang theory?
Discard it all.
Although Dalton's atomic theory was rejected at first he used his theory to do what that soon resulted in his theory being accepted by scientists?
Instead of just stating his own personal opinions John Dalton cited evidence to support his atomic theory. The giving of evidence - which could be proved or disproved by others - was what soon resulted in his theory being accepted by scientists.
When scientists rejected the continental drift were they using the scientific process?
Yes, scientists were using the scientific process when they rejected the continental drift theory. The process involves proposing a hypothesis, testing it through observations and experiments, and revising or rejecting it based on the evidence. In this case, scientists rejected the theory because they did not find enough supporting evidence at the time.
