There are a number of reasons why the Sophists didn't like Socrates (and he didn't like them). One of the main ones is that Socrates was offering to philosophize for free while the sophists charged money for their services. They also had a different end goal in mind while discussing things with others. The sophists wanted to impart their knowledge onto others and make themselves seem wise. Socrates wanted to talk with the interlocutor in hopes that both him and the person to whom he talked could leave the conversation enlightened.
Sophists did not like Socrates because he criticized their teachings that emphasized rhetoric and persuasion over seeking truth and knowledge. Socrates believed in pursuing objective truths through dialectic reasoning, which challenged the relativism and skepticism that the sophists promoted.
Socrates disagreed with the Sophists because he believed in the pursuit of objective truth and knowledge, whereas the Sophists believed in the subjective nature of truth and that it could be manipulated for personal gain. Socrates criticized the Sophists for prioritizing rhetoric and persuasive arguments over genuine wisdom and philosophical inquiry.
Socrates and the Sophists were both ancient Greek philosophers who focused on ethics and the art of rhetoric. However, they differed in their approach - while the Sophists believed that truth was relative and could be manipulated through persuasive speech, Socrates sought objective truth through dialogue and critical thinking.
Sophists believed that truth and morality were relative and could be manipulated through persuasive speech, while Socrates believed in absolute truths and that moral values were objective and existed independently of human perception. They also disagreed on the role of education, with sophists focusing on teaching rhetoric and persuasion skills for personal gain, while Socrates emphasized self-knowledge and pursuing virtue for the betterment of one's soul.
Sophists focused on rhetoric and persuasive speech to win arguments, emphasizing practical skills and relativism. Socrates, on the other hand, promoted critical thinking and the search for objective truth through dialogue and questioning, prioritizing ethics and virtue. Both advanced the tradition of reason by challenging traditional beliefs and encouraging individuals to think for themselves.
Socrates believed that absolute standards of the good, true, and just exist objectively and can be known through reason, while the Sophists believed that these concepts are relative and subject to individual interpretation. Socrates argued that there are universal truths that are not mere products of opinion or persuasion, unlike the Sophists who emphasized rhetoric and persuasion to sway opinions rather than seeking objective truth.
How did the sophists and Socrates advance the tradition of reason and humanis
that sophists thought that knowledge was a way to improve ur life and Socrates thought that there was an absolute right or wrong
Socrates was an opponent of the Sophists. He believed that the Sophists only taught opinions instead of teaching students to find the truth for themselves.
he taught for free
What tell me please
What tell me please
Socrates disagreed with the Sophists because he believed in the pursuit of objective truth and knowledge, whereas the Sophists believed in the subjective nature of truth and that it could be manipulated for personal gain. Socrates criticized the Sophists for prioritizing rhetoric and persuasive arguments over genuine wisdom and philosophical inquiry.
Socrates and the Sophists were both ancient Greek philosophers who focused on ethics and the art of rhetoric. However, they differed in their approach - while the Sophists believed that truth was relative and could be manipulated through persuasive speech, Socrates sought objective truth through dialogue and critical thinking.
They weren't. The Sophists were condemned by Socrates, according to Plato. Aristophanes, on the other hand, claims that Socrates was himself a Sophist no different from any other one.
shutup
The Sophists were hired by the wealthy to speak on any subject. Their teachings were based on no knowledge of the material and used well-formed words to persuade people to believe in them. Their view was that knowledge and understanding were not necessary if the augment made sense. Socrates was different from the Sophists in that he believed knowledge and understanding was key to happiness. Socrates did not argue points he did not believe in, and did not offer arguments for sale. Socrates view of knowledge and understanding was; Knowledge = virtue = happiness
Sophists believed that truth and morality were relative and could be manipulated through persuasive speech, while Socrates believed in absolute truths and that moral values were objective and existed independently of human perception. They also disagreed on the role of education, with sophists focusing on teaching rhetoric and persuasion skills for personal gain, while Socrates emphasized self-knowledge and pursuing virtue for the betterment of one's soul.