o pagl log is ka jawab tu do
Most sciences require empirical evidence (that which is gained from physical interaction and observation), philosophy does not. While empirical evidence effects philosophy. philosophy does not impact the empirical sciences (Chemistry, Biology, etc...)
In philosophy, knowledge is often classified into two main types: a priori knowledge, which is based on reasoning or intuition rather than experience, and a posteriori knowledge, which is based on empirical evidence or observation. Additionally, some philosophers also consider another type called knowledge by acquaintance, which refers to direct and immediate awareness of something.
Authoritative knowledge in philosophy refers to knowledge that is widely accepted as true or valid within a particular philosophical tradition or community. This type of knowledge is often established through a combination of rigorous reasoning, empirical evidence, and consensus among experts in the field.
a posteriori means it argues from experience (empirical evidence) to a conclusion. for example the design arguments claims that there is order in the world (experience) and then concludes that there must be a God who designed this (the conclusion)
In Hume's philosophy, the matter of fact refers to empirical observations and experiences that form the basis of knowledge. It is significant because Hume argues that all knowledge is ultimately derived from these matters of fact, rather than from abstract reasoning or innate ideas. This challenges traditional philosophical views and emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence in understanding the world.
Most sciences require empirical evidence (that which is gained from physical interaction and observation), philosophy does not. While empirical evidence effects philosophy. philosophy does not impact the empirical sciences (Chemistry, Biology, etc...)
In philosophy, knowledge is often classified into two main types: a priori knowledge, which is based on reasoning or intuition rather than experience, and a posteriori knowledge, which is based on empirical evidence or observation. Additionally, some philosophers also consider another type called knowledge by acquaintance, which refers to direct and immediate awareness of something.
Authoritative knowledge in philosophy refers to knowledge that is widely accepted as true or valid within a particular philosophical tradition or community. This type of knowledge is often established through a combination of rigorous reasoning, empirical evidence, and consensus among experts in the field.
a posteriori means it argues from experience (empirical evidence) to a conclusion. for example the design arguments claims that there is order in the world (experience) and then concludes that there must be a God who designed this (the conclusion)
Priori knowledge is "rational" knowledge as opposed to empirical knowledge which is from our "senses".A latin expression that means means formed or conceived beforehand. Made before or without examination; not supported by factual study.
In Hume's philosophy, the matter of fact refers to empirical observations and experiences that form the basis of knowledge. It is significant because Hume argues that all knowledge is ultimately derived from these matters of fact, rather than from abstract reasoning or innate ideas. This challenges traditional philosophical views and emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence in understanding the world.
Philosophy is not considered a science in the traditional sense, as it does not rely on empirical evidence or experimentation to reach conclusions. Instead, philosophy is a discipline that explores fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language through critical thinking and reasoning.
The peripatetic axiom, attributed to Aristotle and his followers, emphasizes the importance of observation and experience in understanding the world. In philosophy, this axiom highlights the value of empirical evidence and practical knowledge in forming theories and arguments.
You should organize the facts you gain from empirical knowledge. With empirical knowledge all you get is a long list of facts and observations. These need to be organized so that we can see the relationship between this knowledge in order to make a prediction that is a logical observation about the facts we have observed. Now we have science!
Empirical knowledge come from observation only. You don't know why or have any idea of why reaction A follows situation B but you have seen it happen so many times that you KNOW that is what is going to happen. People knew that things fell down long before there was a theory of gravitation. Such knowledge was empirical. Empirical knowledge not only comes from observation but also by testing.
One main difference is their beliefs about the nature of reality: Plato argued for a world of ideal Forms, while Aristotle focused on the physical world and empirical observations. Another difference is their views on knowledge: Plato emphasized the role of reason and intellectual insight in obtaining knowledge, while Aristotle valued sensory experience and empirical evidence as sources of knowledge.
Philosophy is a body of knowledge. Theory is one type of unit of knowledge that builds philosophy.