0
Can you explain Science without philosophy is blind and philosophy without science is empty?
Science without philosophy has no guide (is blind). It researches pointless things rather than what we want to know, like the origin of the universe and how to stop global warming. Philosophy without science has no substance (is empty): As an example, more than 2000 years ago, the Grecian philosopher Democritus came up with the idea of atoms, but it was just an idea without meaning until science developed to support his theory.
We are just in a position to understand what is philosophy and science.Just may be a drop in the ocean. So let us allow the younger with their beliefs.Tomorrow these beliefs may correct.
What else can I help you with?
Can you explain science without philosophy is blind and philosophy without science is empty in the context of education?
Philosophy is a thinking art where people put together what they know and then connect those points of knowledge and go farther with them. In science, one finds hard facts and figures. If you were to have science without philosophy, you could do all the experiments you wanted which would give you those points of knowledge, but you wouldn't think about how they would interlink with others in order to build bridges (of knowledge). Conversely, if you didn't have science, you wouldn't have those points of knowledge. Philosophy would not really be possible because you would not have the basic tools to link bits of information in order to create those conclusions.
Why is philosophy considered the parent science?
Philosophy, is basically theoretical science. The ancient Greeks thought they could figure out the mysteries of the universe, just by thinking about them. Of course, you're not going to get very far in science, without being able to prove what you're thinking is true. So Galileo Galilei, comes along with a solution to the problem and says you have to use experimentation. The ancient Greeks where pure philosophers, who where responsible for the famed library at alexsandria. Philosophy is called the parent science, because out of it came all other science. And people like Galileo, Newton, and Einstein are some of the very big stepping stones to modern science.
Can you explain what a thought experiment is in philosophy?
A thought experiment in philosophy is a hypothetical scenario created to explore and analyze complex ideas or concepts. It allows philosophers to consider different possibilities and outcomes without needing to physically test them in reality.
How does the concept of objectivity play a role in the scientific method and the pursuit of knowledge in the field of science?
Objectivity is crucial in the scientific method as it involves gathering and analyzing data without bias or personal beliefs influencing the results. This helps ensure that scientific findings are reliable and can be replicated by others, leading to the advancement of knowledge in the field of science.
What are the different types of descriptive research designs used in social science research?
The different types of descriptive research designs used in social science research include observational studies, surveys, case studies, and correlational studies. These designs aim to describe and analyze the characteristics of a population or phenomenon without manipulating variables.
Can you explain science without philosophy is blind and philosophy without science is empty in the context of education?
Philosophy is a thinking art where people put together what they know and then connect those points of knowledge and go farther with them. In science, one finds hard facts and figures. If you were to have science without philosophy, you could do all the experiments you wanted which would give you those points of knowledge, but you wouldn't think about how they would interlink with others in order to build bridges (of knowledge). Conversely, if you didn't have science, you wouldn't have those points of knowledge. Philosophy would not really be possible because you would not have the basic tools to link bits of information in order to create those conclusions.
How and why science and technology is imfortant to your daily life?
Science can explain how thing happen. Example, science can explain why you can walk without slipping. Without science, there would be no technology. Technology can make what we do simpler. With the help of technology, everything is simpler.
Who said 'science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
; The quote is Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. : Albert Einstein, "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941More quotes of Albert Einstein; see link "Quotes Albert Einstein" on left.
When did Albert Einstein say 'science without religion is lame religion without science is blind?
Albert Einstein said, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" in his 1954 essay "Science and Religion." In the essay, he emphasized the importance of understanding and integrating both science and religion for a more holistic view of the world.
Why is it necessary to observe in science?
Without observing there would be nothing to explain. Science is not just a given such as 1+1, science takes patience and knowledge and lots and lots of time.
What has the author James S Perlman written?
James S. Perlman has written: 'Science without limits' -- subject(s): Science, Methodology, Philosophy, Objectivity
Does philosophy more important than techno science?
not definitely! they need each other because without techno, there would be no philosophy. _usepian
Philosophy and science?
philosphy can be categorized as a science because both the main objective of philosophy and the sciences is to make discovery of things. although the sciences make use of the laboratory to prove their discoveries,philosophy makes use of the mind to prove the existence of things. this my reasoning please tell us more They can be categorized together, but science is based on factual evidence, and philosophy is based on mental/mind proofs made without material evidence.
What is the opposition between science and philosophy?
The primary difference between science and philosophy is that science works on experiment, while philosophy with theories. While learning from both angles is necessary to our understanding of the universe, there are certain cases where one applies and the other does not. When philosophy applies and science does not, it is usually an untestable theory like string theory, Man made climate change and the existence of god. When the reverse is true, things are being discovered which are not predicted or even contradicted by know logic, my main example here is quantum mechanics, and previously life science before 'Origin of the Species', basically anything we are categorizing without understanding.
What needs to be included in a science project?
You have to have the science part because whats a science project without the science part.
Why were myths so important to sumerians?
Without science, they relied on myths to explain how the wolrd had come about and what it was that made it work.
Does science develop without testing a hypothesis?
No, science does not advance without testing hypotheses.
