Yes. The growth would have been a lot slower, and in many places may not have even happened as it did.
The thirteen American colonies differed in their economics. The Southern colonies were good for farming and huge cotton and tobacco plantations were developed. Further North, there was farmlands, however, there were also the growth of manufacturing, craft work, fishing and shipyards.The so-called "northern colonies had a larger population as many immigrants came to the colonies and cities such as Boston, New York and Philadelphia became their homes.
So they can get more population in growth For more wealth and power
During the American Colonial and Revolutionary Periods, the economic activity that encouraged slavery in the southernmost American colonies was agriculture. While the North focused on manufacturing and trade, the South depended almost entirely on the growth of crops, including the labor-intensive crop of cotton. Slaves provided Southern growers with large groups of laborers at very low cost.
Because colonies had little money to invest in industry.
The tremendously rapid growth of American cities in the post-Civil War decades was largely due to immigration. Immigrants from Europe began flooding American shores after the Civil War.
Religion and Virtue contributed to the growth of representative governments in the American Colonies by supporting them and not rebelling (I THINK)
So they can get more population in growth For more wealth and power
The ratio of American colonists to English subjects dramatically declined.
great wave of immigration in that period!
natural reproduction of colonial families.
The growth of Canada led to the Durham Report which changed how Britain treated it's colonies...
So they can get more population in growth For more wealth and power
what is the geographical growth of english
A major factor in the growth of the population of the English colonies was the number of settlers that immigrated to the colonies. They caused the populations to gradually grow as they settled in these colonies.
The thirteen American colonies differed in their economics. The Southern colonies were good for farming and huge cotton and tobacco plantations were developed. Further North, there was farmlands, however, there were also the growth of manufacturing, craft work, fishing and shipyards.The so-called "northern colonies had a larger population as many immigrants came to the colonies and cities such as Boston, New York and Philadelphia became their homes.
Terry D. Beacham has written: 'Biology and exploitation of winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) in the Canadian Maritimes area of the northwest Atlantic ocean' -- subject(s): Flatfish fisheries, Winter flounder 'Variability in size and age at sexual maturity of American plaice and yellowtail flounder in the Canadian Maritimes region of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean' -- subject(s): Fishes, Flatfishes 'Growth and maturity of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence' -- subject(s): Atlantic cod fishing, Growth, Atlantic cod 'Some aspects of growth and Canadian exploitation of haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) on Browns and Georges Bank in the northwest Atlantic Ocean' -- subject(s): Fishes, Haddock, Growth 'Size, age, meristics, and morphometrics of chum salmon returning to southern British Columbia during 1981-1982' -- subject(s): Chum salmon, Age, Growth 'Some aspects of growth and exploitation of American plaice (Hippoglossoides platessoides) in the Canadian Maritimes area of the Northwest Atlantic' -- subject(s): Fishes, Plaice
No. The American colonies were the reason and the growth of more cotton after the cotton gin was invented.