Since slavery was for life, I slave provided more years of work. Apex
Virginia planters expanded their plantations to thousands of acres by 1670& slaves were a cost effective way to get the work done.source: http://www.chacha.com/question/why-did-virginia-planters-switch-to-slave-labor-in-the-1670%27s
In early Virgina, people lived on scattered farms rather than towns. Tobacco farmers soon began founding large farms called plantations. These plantations were made possible in part by use of the headright system. Under this system, colonists who paid their own way to Virginia received 50 acres of land! Colonist participated in plantations so they could make tobacco and earn land.
Slave based plantations were not developed in New England because the slave owners there preferred to have indentured slaves rather than African slaves. This was because they believed the African slaves did not live long enough.
Yes they did. Just watch some old movies. Hattie McDaniel (Mammy in Gone With the Wind) when chastened for playing so many maids in movies said "I would rather make 150.00 a week playing a maid than be one for 15.00".
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Owners of large plantations would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves could be owned for life and were considered property, providing greater control and ensuring a continuous source of cheap labor. Indentured servants had limited terms of service and some legal protections, making them less profitable and reliable for long-term agricultural work. Furthermore, slaves were seen as a permanent underclass, ensuring a highly stratified social structure that benefited plantation owners.
Owners of large plantations preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a more consistent and long-term labor force. Slavery also offered greater control and less risk of the workforce rebelling or leaving after their term of service. Additionally, the racially-based system of slavery perpetuated social hierarchies and reinforced power dynamics in society.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property, providing a long-term source of labor with no freedom or rights. Slaves could be inherited and their children born into slavery, ensuring a continuous workforce. In contrast, indentured servants had limited terms of service and some legal protections, making them less profitable and reliable for plantation owners.
Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and could be bought, sold, and inherited, providing a more permanent and stable labor force. Slaves were also seen as a lifetime investment whereas indentured servants were temporary workers whose contracts would expire. Additionally, slaves were often treated as less than human and did not have legal rights or protections, allowing plantation owners to exert complete control over them.
There was a decline in availability of indentured servants from England. The indentured servants from England weren't good workers. Indentured servitude was outlawed in the colonies.
Upon coming to America, many Poles lived in the North, where slavery was illegal. Polish were more likely to end up as indentured servants rather than slave owners. However, many Polish Americans worked on plantations over seeing slaves, and in many circumstances would have one or two slaves which catered to an entire Polish community in the South.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong source of labor, whereas indentured servants typically worked for a set period before gaining their freedom. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing plantation owners with a greater sense of control and power. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time made slaves a more socially acceptable form of labor exploitation.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a long-term and inheritable source of labor, providing more stability and control over their workforce. Additionally, slaves did not have the legal protections and rights that indentured servants possessed, making them easier to exploit and control. Finally, the racial hierarchy and beliefs of the time perpetuated the notion that Africans and their descendants were inferior and thus suitable for enslavement.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifetime investment, providing a continuous and cheap labor force. Slavery also offered a system of control and dominance that indentured servitude did not provide, as slaves were considered property and had no legal rights. Additionally, the transatlantic slave trade made it easier and more cost-effective to acquire a large number of enslaved individuals.
Slaves were owned as property, but indentured servants were white people who signed a 7 year contract for transportation to the colonies. They could also blend in with the population while anyone who was black was a slave.