answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why would owners of large plantations rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why would owners of large plantations rather slaves than indentured servants?

Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.


Which of these is a reason plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather then indentured servants?

The children of slaves women were slaves who didn't need to be purchased


Why would owners of large plantations rather have slaves than indentured slaves?

Since slavery lasted a lifetime, a slave provided more years of work.


Why did colonists turn to slave labor rather than indentured servants in the late 1600s?

There was a decline in availability of indentured servants from England. The indentured servants from England weren't good workers. Indentured servitude was outlawed in the colonies.


Who were the Polish slave owners?

Upon coming to America, many Poles lived in the North, where slavery was illegal. Polish were more likely to end up as indentured servants rather than slave owners. However, many Polish Americans worked on plantations over seeing slaves, and in many circumstances would have one or two slaves which catered to an entire Polish community in the South.


What is the reason plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather than indentured servants?

Slaves were owned as property, but indentured servants were white people who signed a 7 year contract for transportation to the colonies. They could also blend in with the population while anyone who was black was a slave.


Why would a landowner rather use slaves indentured servants?

Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.


Why would a landowner rather use slaves then indentured servents?

Slaves were property and they were owned by the plantation owners. All slaves were African Americans and could be identified as slaves. Indentured servants were white people that was working off a 7 year contract. If they wanted they could break the contract and fade into the population.


Why did colonial masters first adopt the institution of indentured servitude rather than Indian or black slavery?

Early on, there was a steady stream of white, indentured servants coming from England to the New World. Many were promised land after completing their services and were therefore eager to work. The main reason colonial masters opted for this option was because these indentured servants were much cheaper than African and Indian slaves. After Bacon's rebellion however, and after an economic upturn in England which kept laborers home, indentured servants became a less desirable option. At this point, the slave trade had opened up and indentured servants were seen as too difficult to control.


What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants.?

Since slavery was for life, I slave provided more years of work. Apex


Why did plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather than indentured slaves?

The children of slave woman were slaves who didn't have to be purchased.


Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indentured servants?

Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.